Literature DB >> 9595879

A multistakeholder-driven model for developing an outcome management system.

J R Koch1, A Lewis, D McCall.   

Abstract

Increasing demands for accountability in the delivery of public mental health services are engendering organized systems of treatment outcome monitoring. As such systems are designed and implemented, it is critical that key stakeholders be involved to the greatest extent possible in developing assessment instruments and methodologies so as to ensure relevance and acceptability of the outcome management system. A multistakeholder-based initiative for developing standardized outcome assessment for public mental health services in Virginia is described. Key components of the initiative include the process by which stakeholders were enlisted, the identification of recommended assessment instruments, and a pilot project that began the evaluation of the feasibility, utility, and cost-benefit of using the instruments. To illustrate features of this initiative, the child/adolescent mental health pilot project is described in detail. Implications for behavioral health administrators and next steps for Virginia's outcome management system are discussed, highlighting the role of key stakeholders.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9595879     DOI: 10.1007/BF02287477

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Behav Health Serv Res        ISSN: 1094-3412            Impact factor:   1.505


  4 in total

1.  Guidelines for using standardized outcome measures following addictions treatment.

Authors:  K Graham
Journal:  Eval Health Prof       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 2.651

2.  Measures of impairment for children and adolescents.

Authors:  K Hodges; J Gust
Journal:  J Ment Health Adm       Date:  1995

3.  Assessment and accountability: the third revolution in medical care.

Authors:  A S Relman
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1988-11-03       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  State MR/DD agency information systems and available data related to day and employment programs.

Authors:  R L Schalock; W E Kiernan; M J McGaughey; S A Lynch; L C McNally
Journal:  Ment Retard       Date:  1993-02
  4 in total
  4 in total

1.  Linking data to decision-making: applying qualitative data analysis methods and software to identify mechanisms for using outcomes data.

Authors:  Vaishali N Patel; Anne W Riley
Journal:  J Behav Health Serv Res       Date:  2007-07-24       Impact factor: 1.505

2.  A feasibility study to assess service providers' perspectives regarding the use of the child and adolescent functional assessment scale in Ontario.

Authors:  Katherine M Boydell; Melanie Barwick; H Bruce Ferguson; Rebecca Haines
Journal:  J Behav Health Serv Res       Date:  2005 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 1.505

3.  Clinicians and outcome measurement: what's the use?

Authors:  Ann F Garland; Marc Kruse; Gregory A Aarons
Journal:  J Behav Health Serv Res       Date:  2003 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 1.505

4.  Examining Outcomes of Acute Psychiatric Hospitalization among Children.

Authors:  Priya R Tharayil; James Sigrid; Ronald Morgan; Kimberly Freeman
Journal:  Soc Work Ment Health       Date:  2012
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.