Literature DB >> 9595344

Self-regulatory codes of conduct: are they effective in controlling pharmaceutical representatives' presentations to general medical practitioners?

E E Roughead1, A L Gilbert, K J Harvey.   

Abstract

Self-regulatory codes of conduct are used to control the promotional practices of the pharmaceutical industry, but the effectiveness of these codes in controlling pharmaceutical representatives' presentations has not been examined. This is a matter of concern because pharmaceutical representatives have more influence than any other promotional media on prescribing practices. The authors developed a method for monitoring the oral presentations of pharmaceutical representatives when promoting products to medical practitioners. Sixteen audio-recordings, detailing 64 medicines, were obtained; 38 of the 64 products were prescription-only medicines. Information on indications and on dosage and administration was commonly provided, but information on other areas of drug knowledge, particularly product risk, was minimal. Thirteen presentations contained at least one inaccuracy when compared with Australian Approved Product Information. Presentations did not always comply with current guidelines in the Code of Conduct. The Code provides only limited standards for pharmaceutical representatives' presentations, and no active monitoring system is in place to ensure adherence to the code. There is an urgent need for policy development on the role of pharmaceutical representatives, their standards of practice, and regulation of their activities to ensure they contribute to the appropriate use of medicines.

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9595344     DOI: 10.2190/B81X-4A53-TY5M-C2HR

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Health Serv        ISSN: 0020-7314            Impact factor:   1.663


  7 in total

1.  The tangled web of medical and commercial interests.

Authors:  Wendy A Rogers
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 3.377

2.  General practitioners and pharmaceutical sales representatives: quality improvement research.

Authors:  Geoffrey Spurling; Peter Mansfield
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2007-08

3.  Medicines information provided by pharmaceutical representatives: a comparative study in Australia and Malaysia.

Authors:  Noordin Othman; Agnes I Vitry; Elizabeth E Roughead; Shaiful B Ismail; Khairani Omar
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2010-11-30       Impact factor: 3.295

Review 4.  Quality of pharmaceutical advertisements in medical journals: a systematic review.

Authors:  Noordin Othman; Agnes Vitry; Elizabeth E Roughead
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-07-22       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Doctors' opinions of information provided by Libyan pharmaceutical company representatives.

Authors:  Mustafa A Alssageer; Stefan R Kowalski
Journal:  Libyan J Med       Date:  2012-11-28       Impact factor: 1.657

6.  Characteristics and impact of drug detailing for gabapentin.

Authors:  Michael A Steinman; G Michael Harper; Mary-Margaret Chren; C Seth Landefeld; Lisa A Bero
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 11.069

7.  Medicines Information and the Regulation of the Promotion of Pharmaceuticals.

Authors:  Teresa Leonardo Alves; Joel Lexchin; Barbara Mintzes
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2018-05-02       Impact factor: 3.525

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.