Literature DB >> 9595342

Whose epidemiology, whose health?

S Wing1.   

Abstract

Simplistic claims about the objectivity of science have been challenged from a variety of perspectives. Evaluation of the external context of production of knowledge and the methodological approaches to posing questions and assembling evidence shows that there is no pure "science"; rather, all scientific knowledge is shaped by the social history of its production. Examples are given of how quantitative concepts in modern epidemiology influence the recognition of the causes of disease. The author uses the phenomenon of intensive swine production by vertically integrated agribusiness to illustrate how broad problems such as environmental racism, agricultural determinants of nutrition, loss of natural resources, and conditions conducive to emergence of new diseases are hidden by epidemiological approaches that fit into corporate policy perspectives. It is critically important to ask who produces epidemiological knowledge, and whose health is promoted by that knowledge.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9595342     DOI: 10.2190/Y3GE-NQCK-0LNR-T126

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Health Serv        ISSN: 0020-7314            Impact factor:   1.663


  11 in total

1.  Continuing the debate on the philosophy of modern public health: social quality as a point of reference.

Authors:  L J van der Maesen; H G Nijhuis
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 3.710

2.  Using Participatory Action Research to build Healthy Communities.

Authors:  M Minkler
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2000 Mar-Jun       Impact factor: 2.792

3.  Photopaper as a Tool for Community-Level Monitoring of Industrially Produced Hydrogen Sulfide and Corrosion.

Authors:  Lourdes Vera; Garance Malivel; Drew Michanowicz; Choong-Min Kang; Sara Wylie
Journal:  Atmos Environ X       Date:  2019-09-30

4.  Integrating epidemiology, education, and organizing for environmental justice: community health effects of industrial hog operations.

Authors:  Steve Wing; Rachel Avery Horton; Naeema Muhammad; Gary R Grant; Mansoureh Tajik; Kendall Thu
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2008-06-12       Impact factor: 9.308

5.  Integration of social epidemiology and community-engaged interventions to improve health equity.

Authors:  Nina B Wallerstein; Irene H Yen; S Leonard Syme
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2011-03-18       Impact factor: 9.308

6.  Critical Race Theory, race equity, and public health: toward antiracism praxis.

Authors:  Chandra L Ford; Collins O Airhihenbuwa
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2010-02-10       Impact factor: 9.308

7.  Publication visibility of sensitive public health data: when scientists bury their results.

Authors:  David A Rier
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 3.525

8.  Metal-mixtures in toenails of children living near an active industrial facility in Los Angeles County, California.

Authors:  Yoshira Ornelas Van Horne; Shohreh F Farzan; Jill E Johnston
Journal:  J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol       Date:  2021-05-02       Impact factor: 5.563

9.  Social responsibility and research ethics in community-driven studies of industrialized hog production.

Authors:  Steve Wing
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 9.031

10.  Environmental injustice in North Carolina's hog industry.

Authors:  S Wing; D Cole; G Grant
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 9.031

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.