Literature DB >> 9593561

Prognostic value of vasodilator myocardial perfusion imaging in patients with left bundle-branch block.

H M Wagdy1, D Hodge, T F Christian, T D Miller, R J Gibbons.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The prognostic value of tomographic myocardial perfusion imaging with dipyridamole or adenosine in patients with left bundle-branch block has not been established. METHODS AND
RESULTS: The study group consisted of 245 patients with left bundle-branch block who underwent tomographic (single photon emission tomography) myocardial perfusion imaging with thallium-201 (n=173) or technetium-99m sestamibi (n=72) and either dipyridamole (n=153) or adenosine (n=92) stress. Patients were prospectively classified into two groups. Patients were classified as "high risk" if they had (1) a large severe fixed defect (n=28), (2) a large reversible defect (n=36), or (3) cardiac enlargement and either increased pulmonary uptake (thallium) or a decreased resting ejection fraction (sestamibi) (n=20). The remaining 161 patients (66% of the study group) were at "low risk." Follow-up was 99% complete at 3+/-1.4 years. Three-year overall survival was 57% in the high-risk group compared with 87% in the low-risk group (P<.0001). Survival free of cardiac death/nonfatal myocardial infarction/cardiac transplantation was 55% in the high-risk group and 93% in the low-risk group (P<.0001). The presence of a high-risk scan had significant incremental prognostic value after adjustment for age, sex, diabetes, and previous myocardial infarction (P<.0001). Patients with a low-risk scan had an overall survival that was not significantly different from that of a US age-matched population (P=.86).
CONCLUSIONS: Tomographic myocardial perfusion imaging with adenosine or dipyridamole stress provides important prognostic information in patients with left bundle-branch block, which is incremental to clinical assessment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9593561     DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.97.16.1563

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  10 in total

1.  Prognostic value of automated vs visual analysis for adenosine stress myocardial perfusion SPECT in patients without prior coronary artery disease: a case-control study.

Authors:  Yuan Xu; Ryo Nakazato; Sean Hayes; Rory Hachamovitch; Victor Y Cheng; Heidi Gransar; Romalisa Miranda-Peats; Mark Hyun; Leslee J Shaw; John Friedman; Guido Germano; Daniel S Berman; Piotr J Slomka
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2011-09-20       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 2.  Assessment of prognosis in chronic coronary artery disease.

Authors:  T M Bateman; E Prvulovich
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 3.  Clinical imaging for prevention: directed strategies for improved detection of presymptomatic patients with undetected atherosclerosis--Part I: Clinical imaging for prevention.

Authors:  Leslee J Shaw; Daniel S Berman; Roger S Blumenthal; Matthew J Budoff; Tracy L Faber; Tauqir Goraya; Sandra S Halliburton; Harvey Hecht; Hosen Kiat; Wolfgang Koenig; Shaista Malik; Michael Merhige; Khurram Nasir; James K Min; James O'Keefe; Donna M Polk; Paolo Raggi; Jeffrey A Rosenblatt; Ronald G Schwartz; Allen J Taylor; Gregory S Thomas; William Wijns
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2008 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.952

4.  Incidence of major cardiovascular events in black patients with normal myocardial stress perfusion study results.

Authors:  O O Akinboboye; O Idris; A Onwuanyi; K Berekashvili; S R Bergmann; A Onwjanyi
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2001 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.952

5.  Clinical characteristics and value in early reperfusion therapy for new onset right bundle branch block in patients with acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Jingchao Li; Xiaodong Li; Shujuan Dong; Yapan Yang; Yingjie Chu
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2017-12-21       Impact factor: 2.447

6.  The prognostic value of pharmacologic stress myocardial perfusion imaging in patients with permanent pacemakers.

Authors:  André C Lapeyre; Indu G Poornima; Todd D Miller; David O Hodge; Timothy F Christian; Raymond J Gibbons
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2005 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.952

7.  Patients with left bundle branch block pattern and high cardiac risk myocardial SPECT: does the current management suffice?

Authors:  T J F Ten Cate; J C Kelder; H W M Plokker; J F Verzijlbergen; N M van Hemel
Journal:  Neth Heart J       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 2.380

8.  Myocardial perfusion SPECT identifies patients with left bundle branch block patterns at high risk for future coronary events.

Authors:  Tim J F ten Cate; Johannes C Kelder; Herbert W M Plokker; J Fred Verzijlbergen; Norbert M van Hemel
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2009-12-24       Impact factor: 5.952

9.  Accuracy of non-invasive techniques for diagnosis of coronary artery disease and prediction of cardiac events in patients with left bundle branch block: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Elena Biagini; Leslee J Shaw; Don Poldermans; Arend F L Schinkel; Vittoria Rizzello; Abdou Elhendy; Claudio Rapezzi; Jeroen J Bax
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2006-07-18       Impact factor: 10.057

Review 10.  Myocardial perfusion scintigraphy: the evidence.

Authors:  S R Underwood; C Anagnostopoulos; M Cerqueira; P J Ell; E J Flint; M Harbinson; A D Kelion; A Al-Mohammad; E M Prvulovich; L J Shaw; A C Tweddel
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 9.236

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.