Literature DB >> 9593212

Confined compression of articular cartilage: linearity in ramp and sinusoidal tests and the importance of interdigitation and incomplete confinement.

M D Buschmann1, J Soulhat, A Shirazi-Adl, J S Jurvelin, E B Hunziker.   

Abstract

Experimental and theoretical methods were used to investigate the linearity of the stress response of articular cartilage to ramp and sinusoidal tests in confined compression, as well as the role of cartilage-porous platen and lateral confinement boundary conditions in determining material responses. With respect to linearity, we posed the question as to whether the elicited stress responses to ramp compression, ramp release and sinusoidal tests were similar. With respect to boundary conditions we inquired as to the necessity of specifying a detailed interdigitating contact with the porous filter and of specifying the level of confinement present at the lateral edge of the disk. We found that the stress responses to the three types of tests were dissimilar, with ramp compression the only test exhibiting linear behavior. Ramp release from a static compression offset was non-linear in a manner such that the cartilage maintained a compressive stress higher than expected by a linear theory. Sinusoidal compression also displayed a non-linear response consistent with the presence of a release phase in each cycle. The actual boundary conditions present at the cartilage/porous-filter interface were visualized histologically. Areas (tens of microns) of cartilage in contact with the metal of the filter were interspersed with areas expanded into the pores of the filter. Finite-element analysis incorporating this information suggested that precise specification of this interface and of the level of the extent of lateral confinement would be necessary for the estimation of material properties, such as the hydraulic permeability, from these tests. The trends of the linearity studies did not appear to be significantly affected by the problems posed by these difficult to quantitate boundary conditions. The non-linear cartilage response to release and sinusoidal displacements therefore appear to be physiologically interesting. The maintained, that is higher than would be linear, compressive stress observed during release may be a beneficial adaptation to repeated loading where temporal variations in tissue stresses would be minimized.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9593212     DOI: 10.1016/s0021-9290(97)00124-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  9 in total

1.  A Systematic Review and Guide to Mechanical Testing for Articular Cartilage Tissue Engineering.

Authors:  Jay M Patel; Brian C Wise; Edward D Bonnevie; Robert L Mauck
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part C Methods       Date:  2019-09-30       Impact factor: 3.056

2.  A Conewise Linear Elasticity mixture model for the analysis of tension-compression nonlinearity in articular cartilage.

Authors:  M A Soltz; G A Ateshian
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 2.097

3.  Correlating material properties with tissue composition in enzymatically digested bovine annulus fibrosus and nucleus pulposus tissue.

Authors:  Delphine S Perie; Jeff J Maclean; Julia P Owen; James C Iatridis
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2006-04-06       Impact factor: 3.934

4.  Use of microindentation to characterize the mechanical properties of articular cartilage: comparison of biphasic material properties across length scales.

Authors:  G J Miller; E F Morgan
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2010-04-22       Impact factor: 6.576

5.  Multimodal evaluation of tissue-engineered cartilage.

Authors:  Joseph M Mansour; Jean F Welter
Journal:  J Med Biol Eng       Date:  2013-02-01       Impact factor: 1.553

Review 6.  [Possibilities for the biomechanical characterization of cartilage: a brief update].

Authors:  C Hurschler; R Abedian
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 1.087

7.  Preclinical Studies for Cartilage Repair: Recommendations from the International Cartilage Repair Society.

Authors:  Mark B Hurtig; Michael D Buschmann; Lisa A Fortier; Caroline D Hoemann; Ernst B Hunziker; Jukka S Jurvelin; Pierre Mainil-Varlet; C Wayne McIlwraith; Robert L Sah; Robert A Whiteside
Journal:  Cartilage       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 4.634

8.  Viscoelasticity and histology of the human cartilage in healthy and degenerated conditions of the knee.

Authors:  Michael Seidenstuecker; Julius Watrinet; Anke Bernstein; Norbert P Suedkamp; Sergio H Latorre; Anastasija Maks; Hermann O Mayr
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2019-08-13       Impact factor: 2.359

9.  Report on a large animal study with Göttingen Minipigs where regenerates and controls for articular cartilage were created in a large number. Focus on the conditions of the operated stifle joints and suggestions for standardized procedures.

Authors:  Markus L Schwarz; Gregor Reisig; Andy Schütte; Kristianna Becker; Susanne Serba; Elmar Forsch; Steffen Thier; Stefan Fickert; Tamara Lenz; Christel Weiß; Svetlana Hetjens; Frederic Bludau; Friederike Bothe; Wiltrud Richter; Barbara Schneider-Wald
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-12-26       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.