Literature DB >> 9593135

Pharmacodynamics of fluconazole in a murine model of systemic candidiasis.

A Louie1, G L Drusano, P Banerjee, Q F Liu, W Liu, P Kaw, M Shayegani, H Taber, M H Miller.   

Abstract

In this study we defined the pharmacodynamic parameter that optimizes outcome in deep-seated Candida albicans infections treated with fluconazole. Using a murine model of systemic candidiasis, we conducted single-dose dose-ranging studies with fluconazole to determine the dosage of this drug that resulted in a 50% reduction in fungal densities (50% effective dose [ED50]) in kidneys versus the fungal densities in the kidneys of untreated controls. We found that the ED50 of fluconazole given intraperitoneally was 4.56 mg/kg of body weight/day (95% confidence interval, 3.60 to 5.53 mg/kg/day), and the dose-response relationship was best described by an inhibitory sigmoid maximal effect (Emax) curve. To define the pharmacodynamics of fluconazole, we gave dosages lower than, approximating, and higher than the ED50 of fluconazole (range, 3.5 to 5.5 mg/kg/day, equivalent to the ED16 to the ED75) to various groups of infected animals using three dose-fractionation schedules. For each total dose of fluconazole examined, the dose-fractionation schedules optimized the ratio of the area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) to the MIC (the AUC/MIC ratio), the ratio of the maximum concentration of drug in serum (Cmax) to the MIC, and the time that the drug remained above the MIC for the infecting C. albicans isolate. Similar reductions in fungal densities in kidneys were seen between groups that received the same total dose of fluconazole in one, two, or four equally divided doses. Thus, dose-fractionation studies demonstrated that the pharmacodynamic parameter of fluconazole that best predicted outcome was the AUC/MIC ratio.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9593135      PMCID: PMC105753          DOI: 10.1128/AAC.42.5.1105

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother        ISSN: 0066-4804            Impact factor:   5.191


  22 in total

Review 1.  Role of pharmacokinetics in the outcome of infections.

Authors:  G L Drusano
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1988-03       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  Pharmacokinetics of fluconazole in cerebrospinal fluid and serum of rabbits: validation of an animal model used to measure drug concentrations in cerebrospinal fluid.

Authors:  A Madu; C Cioffe; U Mian; M Burroughs; E Tuomanen; M Mayers; E Schwartz; M Miller
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  Continuous versus intermittent administration of ceftazidime in experimental Klebsiella pneumoniae pneumonia in normal and leukopenic rats.

Authors:  R Roosendaal; I A Bakker-Woudenberg; M van den Berghe-van Raffe; M F Michel
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1986-09       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  A randomized study of carbenicillin plus cefamandole or tobramycin in the treatment of febrile episodes in cancer patients.

Authors:  G P Bodey; S J Ketchel; V Rodriguez
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1979-10       Impact factor: 4.965

5.  Clinical response to aminoglycoside therapy: importance of the ratio of peak concentration to minimal inhibitory concentration.

Authors:  R D Moore; P S Lietman; C R Smith
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  1987-01       Impact factor: 5.226

6.  Role for dual individualization with cefmenoxime.

Authors:  J J Schentag; I L Smith; D J Swanson; C DeAngelis; J E Fracasso; A Vari; J W Vance
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1984-12-21       Impact factor: 4.965

7.  Once-daily vs. continuous aminoglycoside dosing: efficacy and toxicity in animal and clinical studies of gentamicin, netilmicin, and tobramycin.

Authors:  S H Powell; W L Thompson; M A Luthe; R C Stern; D A Grossniklaus; D D Bloxham; D L Groden; M R Jacobs; A O DiScenna; H A Cash; J D Klinger
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  1983-05       Impact factor: 5.226

8.  Constant infusions vs. intermittent doses of gentamicin against Pseudomonas aeruginosa in vitro.

Authors:  A U Gerber; P Wiprächtiger; U Stettler-Spichiger; G Lebek
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  1982-04       Impact factor: 5.226

9.  Indications for therapy for fungemia in postoperative patients.

Authors:  J S Solomkin; A M Flohr; R L Simmons
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1982-10

10.  Sensitive bioassay for ketoconazole in serum and cerebrospinal fluid.

Authors:  J H Jorgensen; G A Alexander; J R Graybill; D J Drutz
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1981-07       Impact factor: 5.191

View more
  60 in total

1.  Antifungal susceptibility testing of fluconazole by flow cytometry correlates with clinical outcome.

Authors:  C Wenisch; C B Moore; R Krause; E Presterl; P Pichna; D W Denning
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 2.  Antifungal susceptibility testing: practical aspects and current challenges.

Authors:  J H Rex; M A Pfaller; T J Walsh; V Chaturvedi; A Espinel-Ingroff; M A Ghannoum; L L Gosey; F C Odds; M G Rinaldi; D J Sheehan; D W Warnock
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 26.132

Review 3.  Triazole antifungal agents in invasive fungal infections: a comparative review.

Authors:  Cornelia Lass-Flörl
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2011-12-24       Impact factor: 9.546

4.  Therapeutic Approach to Candida Sepsis.

Authors: 
Journal:  Curr Infect Dis Rep       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 3.725

Review 5.  In vivo pharmacodynamics of antifungal drugs in treatment of candidiasis.

Authors:  David Andes
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 6.  Antifungal agents: in vitro susceptibility testing, pharmacodynamics, and prospects for combination therapy.

Authors:  A H Groll; H Kolve
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2004-03-11       Impact factor: 3.267

7.  Population dynamics of antibiotic treatment: a mathematical model and hypotheses for time-kill and continuous-culture experiments.

Authors:  Bruce R Levin; Klas I Udekwu
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2010-06-01       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 8.  Interpretive breakpoints for fluconazole and Candida revisited: a blueprint for the future of antifungal susceptibility testing.

Authors:  M A Pfaller; D J Diekema; D J Sheehan
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 26.132

9.  Pros and Cons of Extrapolating Animal Data on Antifungal Pharmacodynamics to Humans.

Authors:  Scott W Mueller; Tyree H Kiser
Journal:  Curr Fungal Infect Rep       Date:  2011-03-26

10.  Genetic dissection of azole resistance mechanisms in Candida albicans and their validation in a mouse model of disseminated infection.

Authors:  Donna M MacCallum; Alix Coste; Françoise Ischer; Mette D Jacobsen; Frank C Odds; Dominique Sanglard
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2010-01-19       Impact factor: 5.191

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.