Literature DB >> 9591971

Long-term psychosocial characteristics of patients treated for idiopathic scoliosis.

K J Noonan1, L A Dolan, W C Jacobson, S L Weinstein.   

Abstract

Psychosocial characteristics of 95 female patients treated with Milwaukee bracing for idiopathic scoliosis were examined using a battery of five psychosocial scales. Sixty-five patients treated with bracing alone and 30 patients who also underwent arthrodesis for curve progression were compared with 49 age-matched female controls. At an average follow-up of 7 years, no differences in depression or health locus of control existed. Significant perceptions of discrimination and a lower satisfaction of overall appearance was recalled during the treatment phase. By final follow-up, there was no longer any difference between the patients and controls in these areas. Significantly, differences in body-image scores persisted at follow-up. Operative patients had a more negative body image of the axial skeleton in comparison with the braced and control groups. We conclude that transient psychological effects are often present during treatment, and a lower body image may persist for several years in surgical patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9591971

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop        ISSN: 0271-6798            Impact factor:   2.324


  36 in total

1.  Patient and parent perspectives on treatment for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Melanie J Donnelly; Lori A Dolan; Linda Grande; Stuart L Weinstein
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2004

2.  When Should We Wean Bracing for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis?

Authors:  Jason Pui Yin Cheung; Prudence Wing Hang Cheung; Keith Dip-Kei Luk
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Outcome assessment of bracing in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis by the use of the SRS-22 questionnaire.

Authors:  Kenneth M C Cheung; Elaine Y L Cheng; Samantha C W Chan; Kelvin W K Yeung; Keith D K Luk
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2006-08-01       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Outcome in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis after brace treatment and surgery assessed by means of the Scoliosis Research Society Instrument 24.

Authors:  Karen Petra Weigert; Linda Marie Nygaard; Finn Bjarke Christensen; Ebbe Stender Hansen; Cody Bünger
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-11-25       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  The body image disturbance questionnaire-scoliosis better correlates to quality of life measurements than the spinal assessment questionnaire in pediatric idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Jennifer M Bauer
Journal:  Spine Deform       Date:  2021-04-30

6.  No effect of osteopathic treatment on trunk morphology and spine flexibility in young women with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Carol Hasler; Caius Schmid; Andreas Enggist; Conny Neuhaus; Thomas Erb
Journal:  J Child Orthop       Date:  2010-04-18       Impact factor: 1.548

Review 7.  Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: indications for bracing and conservative treatments.

Authors:  André J Kaelin
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2020-01

8.  Does brace treatment impact upon the flexibility and the correctability of idiopathic scoliosis in adolescents?

Authors:  Xu Sun; Wen-jun Liu; Lei-lei Xu; Qi Ding; Sai-hu Mao; Bang-ping Qian; Ze-zhang Zhu; Yong Qiu
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-08-23       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Body image in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: validation of the Body Image Disturbance Questionnaire--Scoliosis Version.

Authors:  Joshua D Auerbach; Baron S Lonner; Canice E Crerand; Suken A Shah; John M Flynn; Tracey Bastrom; Phedra Penn; Jennifer Ahn; Courtney Toombs; Neil Bharucha; Whitney P Bowe; Peter O Newton
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2014-04-16       Impact factor: 5.284

10.  Curve Progression in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Does Not Match Skeletal Growth.

Authors:  Jason Pui Yin Cheung; Prudence Wing Hang Cheung; Dino Samartzis; Keith Dip-Kei Luk
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 4.176

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.