Literature DB >> 9591820

What promotes skin self-examination?

J K Robinson1, D S Rigel, R A Amonette.   

Abstract

The American Academy of Dermatology's national program of Melanoma/Skin Cancer Detection and Prevention, developed in response to the rising incidence of invasive melanoma in the United States, has annually produced extensive print, radio, and television coverage about performing skin self-examination (SSE). This study was conducted to determine factors that motivate people to perform SSE. A 1996 telephone survey evaluated performance of SSE for skin cancer and used questions to identify self-perceived. The performance of SSE was directly correlated with the self-perceived risk of the development of melanoma or skin cancer and discussions with physicians or nurses. People were motivated to perform SSE based on their perceived risk and discussions with doctors. Because patients most easily have access to primary care physicians, these physicians must be educated to identify those who are at risk for the development of melanoma. Primary care physicians and nurses should be encouraged to counsel patients about risk levels, the utility of SSE in limiting their risk, and how to perform SSE. To facilitate this process, risk levels for the development of melanoma (defined on the basis of simple and readily ascertained characteristics that help to educate physicians, nurses, and patients) are provided.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9591820     DOI: 10.1016/s0190-9622(98)70204-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Acad Dermatol        ISSN: 0190-9622            Impact factor:   11.527


  19 in total

1.  Unusual documentation of the transformation of a nevus into malignant melanoma.

Authors:  Lindasusan Marcus; Robert Carlin; Neal Carlin
Journal:  J Clin Aesthet Dermatol       Date:  2009-01

Review 2.  Skin cancer-related prevention and screening behaviors: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Nadine A Kasparian; Jordana K McLoone; Bettina Meiser
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2009-06-12

3.  Comparison of Efficacy of Differing Partner-Assisted Skin Examination Interventions for Melanoma Patients: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Rob Turrisi; Brittney Hultgren; Kimberly A Mallett; Mary Martini; June K Robinson
Journal:  JAMA Dermatol       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 10.282

4.  Public awareness of the threat of melanoma and performance of skin self-examination.

Authors:  J K Robinson
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1998-10

5.  The frequency of self-skin examination and full body skin examination in dermatologists.

Authors:  Peter Saitta; David E Cohen; Darrell Rigel; Steven K Grekin; Ronald Brancaccio
Journal:  J Clin Aesthet Dermatol       Date:  2011-06

Review 6.  Dermoscopy: not just for dermatologists.

Authors:  Xinyuan Wu; Michael A Marchetti; Ashfaq A Marghoob
Journal:  Melanoma Manag       Date:  2015-02-25

7.  Melanoma survivors: health behaviors, surveillance, psychosocial factors, and family concerns.

Authors:  Susan A Oliveria; Elyse Shuk; Jennifer L Hay; Maureen Heneghan; Jacqueline M Goulart; Katherine Panageas; Alan C Geller; Allan C Halpern
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2011-10-06       Impact factor: 3.894

Review 8.  Screening and prevention measures for melanoma: is there a survival advantage?

Authors:  Clara Curiel-Lewandrowski; Suephy C Chen; Susan M Swetter
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 5.075

9.  Correspondence and correlates of couples' skin cancer screening.

Authors:  Carolyn J Heckman; Susan Darlow; Sharon L Manne; Deborah A Kashy; Teja Munshi
Journal:  JAMA Dermatol       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 10.282

10.  Squamous cell carcinoma in solid organ transplant recipients: influences on perception of risk and optimal time to provide education.

Authors:  Nikki N Kim; Susan L Boone; Sara Ortiz; Kim Mallett; Jerod Stapleton; Rob Turrisi; Simon Yoo; Dennis P West; Alfred W Rademaker; June K Robinson
Journal:  Arch Dermatol       Date:  2009-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.