Literature DB >> 9591554

Viscosities of implantable biomaterials in vocal fold augmentation surgery.

R W Chan1, I R Titze.   

Abstract

Vocal fold vibration depends critically on the viscoelasticity of vocal fold tissues. For instance, phonation threshold pressure, a measure of the "ease" of phonation, has been shown to be directly related to the viscosity of the vibrating mucosa. Various implantable biomaterials have been used in vocal fold augmentation surgery, with implantation sites sometimes close to or inside the mucosa. Yet their viscosities or other mechanical properties are seldom known. This study attempts to provide data on viscosities of commonly used phonosurgical biomaterials. Using a parallel-plate rotational rheometer, oscillatory shear experiments were performed on implantable polytetrafluoroethylene (Teflon or Polytef; Mentor Inc., Hingham, MA), collagen (Zyderm; Collagen Corp., Palo Alto, CA), glutaraldehyde crosslinked (GAX) collagen (Phonagel or Zyplast; Collagen Corp.), absorbable gelatin (Gelfoam; Upjohn Co., Kalamazoo, MI), and human abdominal subcutaneous fat. Samples of human vocal fold mucosal tissues were also tested. Under sinusoidal oscillatory shear at 10 Hz and at 37 degrees C, the dynamic viscosity was 116 Pascal-seconds (Pa-s) for polytetrafluoroethylene, 21 Pa-s for gelatin, 8-13 Pa-s for the two types of collagen, 3 Pa-s for fat, and 1 to 3 Pa-s for vocal fold mucosa. Results extrapolated to 100 Hz also show similar differences among the biomaterials, but all values are an order of magnitude lower because of the typical inverse frequency relation (shear thinning effect) for polymeric and biologic materials. The data suggest that the use of fat for vocal fold augmentation may be more conducive to the "ease" of phonation because of its relatively low viscosity, which is closest to physiologic levels. This implication is probably the most relevant in predicting initial outcome of the postoperative voice before there is any significant assimilation (e.g., resorption and fibrosis) of the implanted biomaterial.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9591554     DOI: 10.1097/00005537-199805000-00019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Laryngoscope        ISSN: 0023-852X            Impact factor:   3.325


  35 in total

1.  Vocal dose measures: quantifying accumulated vibration exposure in vocal fold tissues.

Authors:  Ingo R Titze; Jan G Svec; Peter S Popolo
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 2.297

2.  A three-dimensional model of vocal fold abduction/adduction.

Authors:  Eric J Hunter; Ingo R Titze; Fariborz Alipour
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Porcine Vocal Fold Lamina Propria-Derived Biomaterials Modulate TGF-β1-Mediated Fibroblast Activation in Vitro.

Authors:  Camilo Mora-Navarro; Andreea Badileanu; Ana M Gracioso Martins; Emily W Ozpinar; Lewis Gaffney; Ian Huntress; Erin Harrell; Jeffrey R Enders; Xinxia Peng; Ryan C Branski; Donald O Freytes
Journal:  ACS Biomater Sci Eng       Date:  2020-02-11

4.  Viscoelasticity of hyaluronic acid-gelatin hydrogels for vocal fold tissue engineering.

Authors:  Siavash Kazemirad; Hossein K Heris; Luc Mongeau
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater       Date:  2015-02-27       Impact factor: 3.368

5.  Rheological behavior of anionic collagen injectable gels in the presence of rhamsan for plastic surgery applications.

Authors:  Márcio de Paula; Gilberto Goissis; Virginia Conceição Amaro Martins
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2007-05-05       Impact factor: 3.896

6.  Rayleigh wave propagation method for the characterization of a thin layer of biomaterials.

Authors:  Siavash Kazemirad; Luc Mongeau
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Mesenchymal stromal cell injection promotes vocal fold scar repair without long-term engraftment.

Authors:  R S Bartlett; J T Guille; X Chen; M B Christensen; S F Wang; S L Thibeault
Journal:  Cytotherapy       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 5.414

8.  Local vascularized flaps for augmentation of Reinke's space.

Authors:  Seth H Dailey; McLean Gunderson; Roger Chan; Jose Torrealba; Miwako Kimura; Nathan V Welham
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 3.325

9.  [Treatment of glottal gap].

Authors:  S Voigt-Zimmermann; C Arens
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 1.284

Review 10.  Vocal fold scars: current concepts and future directions. Consensus report of the Phonosurgery Committee of the European Laryngological Society.

Authors:  G Friedrich; F G Dikkers; C Arens; M Remacle; M Hess; A Giovanni; S Duflo; A Hantzakos; V Bachy; M Gugatschka
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2013-04-21       Impact factor: 2.503

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.