Literature DB >> 9590915

A comparative study of anesthetic techniques for mandibular dental extraction.

H B Dumbrigue1, M V Lim, R A Rudman, A Serraon.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare the effectiveness of the intraligamentary technique of anesthetic administration (ILA) with the inferior alveolar nerve block (IANB) in extraction of mandibular teeth.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: ILA and IANB injections using Citanest with Octapressin were administered on 16 patients requiring bilateral mandibular dental extractions. Discomfort during needle placement, profoundness of anesthesia obtained, and patient preference were evaluated for both techniques.
RESULTS: A total of 45 teeth were extracted. Ten patients (62.5%) reported discomfort during needle placement with ILA injection compared to three patients (18.75%) with IANB (P = 0.031). Fifty percent (12/24) of teeth extracted with ILA injection were removed without discomfort to the patient compared to 85.7% (18/21) using IANB (P = 0.027). No difference in patient preference between the two techniques was noted.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9590915

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Dent        ISSN: 0894-8275            Impact factor:   1.522


  3 in total

1.  Comparison of injection pain, heart rate increase, and postinjection pain of articaine and lidocaine in a primary intraligamentary injection administered with a computer-controlled local anesthetic delivery system.

Authors:  John Nusstein; Jeffrey Berlin; Al Reader; Mike Beck; Joel M Weaver
Journal:  Anesth Prog       Date:  2004

2.  Periodontal intraligament injection as alternative to inferior alveolar nerve block--meta-analysis of the literature from 1979 to 2012.

Authors:  N Shabazfar; M Daubländer; B Al-Nawas; P W Kämmerer
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2013-09-29       Impact factor: 3.573

3.  Prospective clinical study comparing intraligamentary anesthesia and inferior alveolar nerve block for extraction of posterior mandibular teeth.

Authors:  P W Kämmerer; A Adubae; I Buttchereit; D G E Thiem; M Daubländer; B Frerich
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2017-10-15       Impact factor: 3.573

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.