Literature DB >> 9589508

Social support, life stress, pain and emotional adjustment to advanced breast cancer.

C Koopman1, K Hermanson, S Diamond, K Angell, D Spiegel.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine relationships between emotional adjustment to advanced breast cancer, pain, social support, and life stress. The cross-sectional sample was compromised of 102 women with metastatic and/or recurrent breast cancer who were recruited into a randomized psychosocial intervention study. All women completed baseline questionnaires assessing demographic and medical variables, social support, life stress, pain, and mood disturbance. Three types of social support were assessed: (1) number of persons in support system; (2) positive support; and (3) aversive support. On the Profile of Mood States (POMS) total score, we found significant interactions between life stress and social support; having more people in the patient's support system was associated with less mood disturbance, but only among patients who had undergone greater life stress. Also, aversive social contact was significantly related to total mood disturbance (POMS), and having more aversive social contact was particularly associated with total mood disturbance (POMS) among patients who had undergone greater life stress. Pain intensity was associated with greater total life stress, and was not significantly related to social support. These results are consistent with the 'buffering hypothesis' that social support may shield women with metastatic breast cancer from the effects of previous life stress on their emotional adjustment; however, aversive support may be an additional source of life stress associated with emotional distress. Also, pain is greater among women with greater life stress, regardless of social support.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9589508     DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1611(199803/04)7:2<101::AID-PON299>3.0.CO;2-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychooncology        ISSN: 1057-9249            Impact factor:   3.894


  40 in total

1.  Psychological responses to cancer recurrence.

Authors:  Barbara L Andersen; Charles L Shapiro; William B Farrar; Timothy Crespin; Sharla Wells-Digregorio
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2005-10-01       Impact factor: 6.860

2.  Gender, age and surgery as a treatment modality leads to higher distress in patients with cancer.

Authors:  Bejoy C Thomas; V NandaMohan; Madhvan K Nair; Manoj Pandey
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2010-02-23       Impact factor: 3.603

3.  Emotions and social relationships for breast and gynecologic patients: a qualitative study of coping with recurrence.

Authors:  Lisa M Thornton; Anna O Levin; Caroline S Dorfman; Neha Godiwala; Carolyn Heitzmann; Barbara L Andersen
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2013-10-14       Impact factor: 3.894

4.  Empathic exchanges in online cancer support groups: distinguishing message expression and reception effects.

Authors:  Jeong Yeob Han; Dhavan V Shah; Eunkyung Kim; Kang Namkoong; Sun-Young Lee; Tae Joon Moon; Rich Cleland; Q Lisa Bu; Fiona M McTavish; David H Gustafson
Journal:  Health Commun       Date:  2011-03

5.  An evaluation of a computer-imaging program to prepare women for chemotherapy-related alopecia.

Authors:  Elizabeth L McGarvey; Maguadalupe Leon-Verdin; Lora D Baum; Karen Bloomfield; David R Brenin; Cheryl Koopman; Scott Acton; Brian Clark; B Eugene Parker
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 3.894

6.  Quality of life trajectories after diagnosis of gynecologic cancer: a theoretically based approach.

Authors:  Brian D Gonzalez; Sharon L Manne; Jerod Stapleton; Shannon Myers-Virtue; Melissa Ozga; David Kissane; Carolyn Heckman; Mark Morgan
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2016-10-19       Impact factor: 3.603

7.  Life sustaining irritations? Relationship quality and mortality in the context of chronic illness.

Authors:  Kira Birditt; Toni C Antonucci
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2008-07-26       Impact factor: 4.634

8.  Psychosocial intervention for rural women with breast cancer: The Sierra-Stanford Partnership.

Authors:  Karyn L Angell; Mary Anne Kreshka; Rebecca McCoy; Patricia Donnelly; Julie M Turner-Cobb; Kathy Graddy; Helena C Kraemer; Cheryl Koopman
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 5.128

9.  Noncancer life stresses in newly diagnosed cancer.

Authors:  Ulla-Sisko Lehto; Markku Ojanen; Anna Väkevä; Arpo Aromaa; Pirkko Kellokumpu-Lehtinen
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2008-04-02       Impact factor: 3.603

10.  Functioning and health in patients with cancer on home-parenteral nutrition: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Martin Mueller; Stefanie Lohmann; Paul Thul; Arved Weimann; Eva Grill
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2010-04-16       Impact factor: 3.186

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.