Literature DB >> 9589331

Cesarean section rates: effects of participation in a performance measurement project.

V A Kazandjian1, T R Lied.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A decade-old indicator-based research initiative, Maryland's Quality Indicator (QI) Project, analyzed data for cesarean section rates among its approximately 1,100 voluntarily participating hospitals. It was posited that continuous participation in this performance measurement initiative would be associated with decreased primary and repeat C-section rates.
METHODS: A retrospective study compared a group of 110 hospitals that reported on the C-section indicator continuously between 1991 and 1996 with a group of hospitals that did not continuously report data on the C-section rate.
RESULTS: Among the 110 continuously participating hospitals in the QI Project, the total C-section rate declined from 22.5% in 1991 to 19.4% in 1996 (p < .01). For this same group, the primary C-section rate declined from 15.8% to 13.9% (p < .01), and the repeat C-section rate declined from 75.0% to 61.2% between 1991 and 1996 (p < .01). The comparison group of 957 hospitals that did not continuously participate in C-section reporting between 1991 and 1996 did not experience a statistically significant difference in total C-section rates during this time (from 21.2% in 1991 to 20.7% in 1996). In attempting to investigate alternative explanations for these results, a subsequent analysis of eight hospital variables potentially related to cesarean delivery rates found no significant differences between the two groups.
CONCLUSIONS: This study provides support for the positive association between continuous participation in a performance measurement project and performance improvement.

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9589331     DOI: 10.1016/s1070-3241(16)30371-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Jt Comm J Qual Improv        ISSN: 1070-3241


  8 in total

1.  Defining appropriateness: the challenge of knowing the difference.

Authors:  V A Kazandjian
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  1998-12

2.  How to effectively implement an indicator system to improve performance from a management perspective: the case of Taiwan Healthcare Indicator Series (THIS) system.

Authors:  Yu-Chi Tung; Ming-Chin Yang
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 4.460

3.  Performance measurement in healthcare: part I--concepts and trends from a State of the Science Review.

Authors:  Carol E Adair; Elizabeth Simpson; Ann L Casebeer; Judith M Birdsell; Katharine A Hayden; Steven Lewis
Journal:  Healthc Policy       Date:  2006-05

4.  Randomized trial of enhanced profiling in substance abuse treatment.

Authors:  Marilyn Daley; Donald S Shepard; Christopher Tompkins; Robert Dunigan; Sharon Reif; Jennifer Perloff; Lauren Siembab; Constance Horgan
Journal:  Adm Policy Ment Health       Date:  2011-03

Review 5.  Non-clinical interventions for reducing unnecessary caesarean section.

Authors:  Innie Chen; Newton Opiyo; Emma Tavender; Sameh Mortazhejri; Tamara Rader; Jennifer Petkovic; Sharlini Yogasingam; Monica Taljaard; Sugandha Agarwal; Malinee Laopaiboon; Jason Wasiak; Suthit Khunpradit; Pisake Lumbiganon; Russell L Gruen; Ana Pilar Betran
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-09-28

6.  Audit and feedback using the Robson classification to reduce caesarean section rates: a systematic review.

Authors:  A A Boatin; F Cullinane; M R Torloni; A P Betrán
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2017-07-17       Impact factor: 6.531

7.  HEDIS performance trends in Medicare managed care.

Authors:  T R Lied; S Sheingold
Journal:  Health Care Financ Rev       Date:  2001

8.  Combining HEDIS indicators: a new approach to measuring plan performance.

Authors:  Terry R Lied; Richard Malsbary; Christopher Eisenberg; James Ranck
Journal:  Health Care Financ Rev       Date:  2002
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.