Literature DB >> 9589166

Modelling the human olfactory stimulus-response function.

M Chastrette1, T Thomas-Danguin, E Rallet.   

Abstract

Two models, derived from the equations of Michaelis-Menten and Hill, were adapted to olfaction. Their ability to model human olfactory stimulus-response relationships was compared with that of the classical laws of Fechner and Stevens. First, these four models were systematically compared on data available in the literature concerning 20 pure odorous compounds. At the lower concentrations of the odorous compound, the model of Stevens was found to be as good as the model of Hill. However, when the concentration range was extended further and included the concentration at half the maximum intensity, the model of Hill was found to be better. Second, the four models were tested on different parts of a true stimulus-response sigmoid curve with 5% noise added. The comparison confirmed the results obtained when experimental data were used. Third, the hypothesis that the psychophysical response is the sum of sigmoidal responses generated at the more peripheral parts of the olfactory system was examined, assuming a binomial distribution of receptor affinities. Within a very large range of variation in their characteristics, the sums of several sigmoids are indeed correctly modelled by Hill equations with exponents reflecting the distribution of receptor affinities.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9589166     DOI: 10.1093/chemse/23.2.181

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chem Senses        ISSN: 0379-864X            Impact factor:   3.160


  8 in total

1.  Odor frequency and odor annoyance. Part I: assessment of frequency, intensity and hedonic tone of environmental odors in the field.

Authors:  Kirsten Sucker; Ralf Both; Michael Bischoff; Rainer Guski; Gerhard Winneke
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2007-10-12       Impact factor: 3.015

Review 2.  From molecule to mind: an integrative perspective on odor intensity.

Authors:  Joel D Mainland; Johan N Lundström; Johannes Reisert; Graeme Lowe
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  2014-06-17       Impact factor: 13.837

3.  Attentional modulation of desensitization to odor.

Authors:  Nicholas Fallon; Timo Giesbrecht; Andrej Stancak
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 2.199

4.  Human Oral Sensitivity to and Taste Modulation by 3-Mercapto-2-Methylpentan-1-ol.

Authors:  Paul M Wise; Anne Ledyard
Journal:  Chemosens Percept       Date:  2022-02-25       Impact factor: 1.833

Review 5.  Perfume and Flavor Engineering: A Chemical Engineering Perspective.

Authors:  Alírio E Rodrigues; Idelfonso Nogueira; Rui P V Faria
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2021-05-22       Impact factor: 4.411

Review 6.  The perception of odor objects in everyday life: a review on the processing of odor mixtures.

Authors:  Thierry Thomas-Danguin; Charlotte Sinding; Sébastien Romagny; Fouzia El Mountassir; Boriana Atanasova; Elodie Le Berre; Anne-Marie Le Bon; Gérard Coureaud
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-06-02

7.  Neural Coding of Perceived Odor Intensity.

Authors:  Yevgeniy B Sirotin; Roman Shusterman; Dmitry Rinberg
Journal:  eNeuro       Date:  2015-12-03

8.  Olfactory perception of chemically diverse molecules.

Authors:  Andreas Keller; Leslie B Vosshall
Journal:  BMC Neurosci       Date:  2016-08-08       Impact factor: 3.288

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.