PURPOSE: To describe the ophthalmologic findings and electroretinograms in patients with microcephaly and chorioretinal degeneration. METHODS: We reviewed the hospital records of 20 patients with microcephaly that was not part of a recognizable syndrome prior to initial referral to the institutional consultative practice of one of the authors (RGW). Twelve patients, all from separate families, were diagnosed as having microcephaly with chorioretinopathy. Ten of these patients had ISCEV-standard electroretinograms (ERG). RESULTS: No family history of microcephaly or retinal degeneration was found in any of our patients. Three patients had another family member with mental retardation. Three of the 12 were compatible with the autosomal dominant form of microcephaly with chorioretinopathy (MIM 156590), possibly as a new mutation. Eight patients, who had fundus findings of retinitis pigmentosa, were similar to the autosomal recessive form of microcephaly with chorioretinal degeneration (MIM 251270). The ERGs were moderately to severely subnormal for responses of both rods and cones. The retinal findings varied from no pigmentary changes, pigment clumping and bone spicules, pigmentary granularity, bull's eye maculopathy, choroidal and retinal atrophy, to lacunar depigmentation. Mental retardation was mild to profound. The abnormal findings from MRI/ CT brain scans (8 patients) were cerebellar atrophy (2), agenesis of cerebellar vermis (1), cortical atrophy (1), and pachygyria (1). Dysmorphic features were present in most patients. Chromosome studies were normal, except for one patient with ring chromosome 14. CONCLUSIONS: Although the patients reviewed in this study represent a heterogeneous group of disorders, ocular abnormalities, especially retinal degeneration, are frequent among patients with microcephaly.
PURPOSE: To describe the ophthalmologic findings and electroretinograms in patients with microcephaly and chorioretinal degeneration. METHODS: We reviewed the hospital records of 20 patients with microcephaly that was not part of a recognizable syndrome prior to initial referral to the institutional consultative practice of one of the authors (RGW). Twelve patients, all from separate families, were diagnosed as having microcephaly with chorioretinopathy. Ten of these patients had ISCEV-standard electroretinograms (ERG). RESULTS: No family history of microcephaly or retinal degeneration was found in any of our patients. Three patients had another family member with mental retardation. Three of the 12 were compatible with the autosomal dominant form of microcephaly with chorioretinopathy (MIM 156590), possibly as a new mutation. Eight patients, who had fundus findings of retinitis pigmentosa, were similar to the autosomal recessive form of microcephaly with chorioretinal degeneration (MIM 251270). The ERGs were moderately to severely subnormal for responses of both rods and cones. The retinal findings varied from no pigmentary changes, pigment clumping and bone spicules, pigmentary granularity, bull's eye maculopathy, choroidal and retinal atrophy, to lacunar depigmentation. Mental retardation was mild to profound. The abnormal findings from MRI/ CT brain scans (8 patients) were cerebellar atrophy (2), agenesis of cerebellar vermis (1), cortical atrophy (1), and pachygyria (1). Dysmorphic features were present in most patients. Chromosome studies were normal, except for one patient with ring chromosome 14. CONCLUSIONS: Although the patients reviewed in this study represent a heterogeneous group of disorders, ocular abnormalities, especially retinal degeneration, are frequent among patients with microcephaly.
Authors: Pawan Kumar Singh; John-Michael Guest; Mamta Kanwar; Joseph Boss; Nan Gao; Mark S Juzych; Gary W Abrams; Fu-Shin Yu; Ashok Kumar Journal: JCI Insight Date: 2017-02-23
Authors: Maria F Shurygina; Joseph M Simonett; Maria A Parker; Amanda Mitchell; Florin Grigorian; Jacob Lifton; Aaron Nagiel; Alexander A Shpak; Elena L Dadali; Irina A Mishina; Richard G Weleber; Paul Yang; Mark E Pennesi Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2020-11-02 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Estéfane da C Nunes; Ana M B de Filippis; Taiane do E S Pereira; Nieli R da C Faria; Álvaro Salgado; Cleiton S Santos; Teresa C P X Carvalho; Juan I Calcagno; Flávia L L Chalhoub; David Brown; Marta Giovanetti; Luiz C J Alcantara; Fernanda K Barreto; Isadora C de Siqueira; Gisele A B Canuto Journal: Pathogens Date: 2021-04-13
Authors: Gabriela E Jones; Pia Ostergaard; Anthony T Moore; Fiona C Connell; Denise Williams; Oliver Quarrell; Angela F Brady; Isabel Spier; Filiz Hazan; Oana Moldovan; Dagmar Wieczorek; Barbara Mikat; Florence Petit; Christine Coubes; Robert A Saul; Glen Brice; Kristiana Gordon; Steve Jeffery; Peter S Mortimer; Pradeep C Vasudevan; Sahar Mansour Journal: Eur J Hum Genet Date: 2013-11-27 Impact factor: 4.246