Literature DB >> 9587697

Effect of image artifacts, organ motion, and poor segmentation on the reliability and accuracy of three-dimensional chamfer matching.

M van Herk1, K G Gilhuijs, J de Munck, A Touw.   

Abstract

Our objective was to investigate the influence of various image artifacts on three-dimensional chamfer matching. A number of artificial and natural artifacts (for instance, as a model for CT-MR matching) were introduced or suppressed in pairs of pelvic CT scans, and a perturbation study was used to determine reliability and accuracy in a well known ground truth situation. In general, chamfer matching is extremely robust against missing data, low resolution, and poor segmentation of the images. In the presence of artifacts, minimization of the average distance outperformed minimization of the root-mean-square distance. Outliers in the scan from which the point list is obtained must be avoided. For example, rotation of the femurs reduces CT-CT registration accuracy by 1-2 mm. The robustness of chamfer matching is confirmed by a limited perturbation study of CT-MR registration for the pelvic region. In conclusion, chamfer matching is extremely accurate and reliable if outliers are avoided in the scan from which the point list is derived, and the average distance is used as a cost function.

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9587697     DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0150(1997)2:6<346::AID-IGS5>3.0.CO;2-#

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Comput Aided Surg        ISSN: 1092-9088


  4 in total

1.  Adaptive and self-evaluating registration method for myocardial perfusion assessment.

Authors:  T Delzescaux; F Frouin; A De Cesare; S Philipp-Foliguet; R Zeboudj; M Janier; A Todd-Pokropek; A Herment
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 2.310

2.  Method comparison of automated matching software-assisted cone-beam CT and stereoscopic kilovoltage x-ray positional verification image-guided radiation therapy for head and neck cancer: a prospective analysis.

Authors:  Clifton D Fuller; Todd J Scarbrough; Jan-Jakob Sonke; Coen R N Rasch; Mehee Choi; Joe Y Ting; Samuel J Wang; Niko Papanikolaou; David I Rosenthal
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2009-11-24       Impact factor: 3.609

3.  Effects of rigid and non-rigid image registration on test-retest variability of quantitative [18F]FDG PET/CT studies.

Authors:  Floris Hp van Velden; Paul van Beers; Johan Nuyts; Linda M Velasquez; Wendy Hayes; Adriaan A Lammertsma; Ronald Boellaard; Dirk Loeckx
Journal:  EJNMMI Res       Date:  2012-03-10       Impact factor: 3.138

4.  Effects of reusing baseline volumes of interest by applying (non-)rigid image registration on positron emission tomography response assessments.

Authors:  Floris H P van Velden; Ida A Nissen; Wendy Hayes; Linda M Velasquez; Otto S Hoekstra; Ronald Boellaard
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-01-28       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.