| Literature DB >> 9587305 |
Abstract
The aim of this study was to evaluate the canal cleanliness achieved by five different preparation techniques, including use of the laser. By randomization, the palatal roots of 50 maxillary molars were assigned to one of five groups. During all preparations, a sodium hypochlorite irrigant was used. The following techniques were studied: (A) manual instrumentation (serial preparation), (B) laser preparation (Nd:YAP laser), (C) manual preparation with laser as adjunct, (D) manual preparation with a subsonic device as adjunct (MM 3000 with shapers), and (E) manual instrumentation with a subsonic device and laser as adjuncts (MM 3000 with shapers, Nd:YAP laser). The canal wall surfaces were examined under a scanning electron microscope at all levels with a new method using grid incrustation on the microscope screen. Techniques A and C differed from each other only by the size of the debris particles, which were smaller for the C preparation. For laser preparation (B) there was little increase in canal diameter increase, and a substantial amount of debris was present. The differences between techniques A, C, and D were not significant. The use of the subsonic device and laser together as adjuncts (E) showed the cleanest preparation with very little debris, opened tubules, and very small particle size. This result suggests that the laser has a potential in ensuring optimal canal cleanliness.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 1997 PMID: 9587305 DOI: 10.1016/S0099-2399(97)80398-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Endod ISSN: 0099-2399 Impact factor: 4.171