PURPOSE: To investigate the response rate, time to treatment failure (TTF), overall survival, and toxicity in patients with metastatic melanoma treated withdacarbazine alone, dacarbazine plus interferon (IFN), dacarbazine plus tamoxifen (TMX), or dacarbazine plus IFN plus TMX. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two hundred seventy-one patients (258 were eligible) were randomized in a 2 x 2 factorial design to receive one of the above treatments. The trial was designed to detect a 50% improvement in survival with 83% power. RESULTS:Nine complete (CRs) and 18 partial responses (PRs) were observed in the patients who received treatments that contained IFN compared with four CRs and 18 PRs in the patients who received treatments that did not contain IFN. Five CRs and 20 PRs occurred in patients treated with TMX compared with eight CRs and 16 PRs in those treated without TMX. Response differences were nonsignificant. The overall median TTF was 2.6 months, and the overall median survival was 8.9 months. There was no significant difference in TTF or survival among any of the different treatments. Poor performance status (PS), hepatic metastases, and weight loss were significant adverse prognostic factors. Twenty-three patients had a TTF greater than 20 months, and these durable responses were evenly distributed among the treatment arms. Significantly more severe and life-threatening toxic events occurred with treatments that contained IFN. CONCLUSION: Neither IFN, TMX, nor the combination significantly improved the response rate, TTF, or survival when added to dacarbazine, but IFN significantly increased toxicity.
RCT Entities:
PURPOSE: To investigate the response rate, time to treatment failure (TTF), overall survival, and toxicity in patients with metastatic melanoma treated with dacarbazine alone, dacarbazine plus interferon (IFN), dacarbazine plus tamoxifen (TMX), or dacarbazine plus IFN plus TMX. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two hundred seventy-one patients (258 were eligible) were randomized in a 2 x 2 factorial design to receive one of the above treatments. The trial was designed to detect a 50% improvement in survival with 83% power. RESULTS: Nine complete (CRs) and 18 partial responses (PRs) were observed in the patients who received treatments that contained IFN compared with four CRs and 18 PRs in the patients who received treatments that did not contain IFN. Five CRs and 20 PRs occurred in patients treated with TMX compared with eight CRs and 16 PRs in those treated without TMX. Response differences were nonsignificant. The overall median TTF was 2.6 months, and the overall median survival was 8.9 months. There was no significant difference in TTF or survival among any of the different treatments. Poor performance status (PS), hepatic metastases, and weight loss were significant adverse prognostic factors. Twenty-three patients had a TTF greater than 20 months, and these durable responses were evenly distributed among the treatment arms. Significantly more severe and life-threatening toxic events occurred with treatments that contained IFN. CONCLUSION: Neither IFN, TMX, nor the combination significantly improved the response rate, TTF, or survival when added to dacarbazine, but IFN significantly increased toxicity.
Authors: Kyle A DiVito; Valerie A Trabosh; You-Shin Chen; Yu Chen; Chris Albanese; Delphine Javelaud; Alain Mauviel; Cynthia M Simbulan-Rosenthal; Dean S Rosenthal Journal: Pigment Cell Melanoma Res Date: 2010-08-25 Impact factor: 4.693
Authors: Harriet M Kluger; Mary M McCarthy; Ayesha B Alvero; Mario Sznol; Stephan Ariyan; Robert L Camp; David L Rimm; Gil Mor Journal: J Transl Med Date: 2007-01-26 Impact factor: 5.531
Authors: Takuji Mori; Steve R Martinez; Steven J O'Day; Donald L Morton; Naoyuki Umetani; Minoru Kitago; Atsushi Tanemura; Sandy L Nguyen; Andy N Tran; He-Jing Wang; Dave S B Hoon Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2006-07-01 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Richard F Kefford; Philip R Clingan; Benjamin Brady; Andrea Ballmer; Adele Morganti; Peter Hersey Journal: Mol Cancer Date: 2010-03-30 Impact factor: 27.401
Authors: D Schadendorf; S M Algarra; L Bastholt; G Cinat; B Dreno; A M M Eggermont; E Espinosa; J Guo; A Hauschild; T Petrella; J Schachter; P Hersey Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 2009-08 Impact factor: 32.976