Literature DB >> 9586753

Effect of luminance on visual evoked potential amplitudes in normal and disabled readers.

J R Brannan1, H A Solan, A P Ficarra, E Ong.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Considerable evidence exists that some reading-disabled children have disordered visual processing, specifically in the fast processing magnocellular (M) pathway.
METHODS: The extent that varying luminance and temporal frequency affect amplitude and latency of visual evoked potentials (VEPs) in normally achieving and reading-disabled children grades 4 to 6 was measured. Each group consisted of approximately 30 subjects. Monocular and binocular single channel VEPs were recorded using a sinusoidal checkerboard pattern of spatial frequency 14 min arc at 3 different temporal frequencies (1, 4, and 8 Hz), and an 8 Hz flicker fusion stimulus. Stimuli were presented under high and low luminance conditions. The peak of the major positive wave component (P100) of each waveform and the trough of the previous major negative wave component were identified, and the peak to trough amplitude was measured.
RESULTS: Statistical analysis of the VEP amplitudes and latencies in response to different experimental conditions was performed using a repeated measure analysis of variance (MANOVA). VEP amplitudes were significantly higher for normal readers across all conditions. Within all subjects, significant effects were found for monocular vs. binocular viewing, temporal frequencies, and high vs. low luminance. Similar analysis of latencies revealed no significant differences.
CONCLUSIONS: The presence of a weaker VEP response in reading-disabled children suggests a deficit early in visual processing. The significant difference in VEP amplitudes between the two reading groups provides an objective measure of a deficit in the M pathway that has been implicated in this condition. Whether serial VEP recordings might help to assess the effects of optometric therapy by providing an independent index of therapeutic efficiency is of special interest.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9586753     DOI: 10.1097/00006324-199804000-00025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Optom Vis Sci        ISSN: 1040-5488            Impact factor:   1.973


  4 in total

1.  Effect of different stimulus configurations on the visual evoked potential (VEP).

Authors:  Naveen K Yadav; Diana P Ludlam; Kenneth J Ciuffreda
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-03-20       Impact factor: 2.379

2.  Pattern Visual Evoked Potentials in Dyslexic Children.

Authors:  Javad Heravian Shandiz; Mohsen Heyrani; Davood Sobhani-Rad; Zeinab Salehinejad; Shirin Shojaei; Mohamad Javad Khoshsima; Abbas Azimi; Abbas Ali Yekta; Seyed Hosein Hoseini Yazdi
Journal:  J Ophthalmic Vis Res       Date:  2017 Oct-Dec

3.  Lesser suppression of response to bright visual stimuli and visual abnormality in children with autism spectrum disorder: a magnetoencephalographic study.

Authors:  Sho Aoki; Kuriko Kagitani-Shimono; Junko Matsuzaki; Ryuzo Hanaie; Mariko Nakanishi; Koji Tominaga; Yukie Nagai; Ikuko Mohri; Masako Taniike
Journal:  J Neurodev Disord       Date:  2019-06-14       Impact factor: 4.025

4.  Steady-State Pattern Electroretinogram and Frequency Doubling Technology in Adult Dyslexic Readers.

Authors:  Costantino Schiavi; Alessandro Finzi; Mauro Cellini
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-12-11
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.