Literature DB >> 9586201

Respirator performance ratings for speech intelligibility.

K M Coyne1, A T Johnson, G H Yeni-Komshian, C R Dooly.   

Abstract

A respirator degrades speech intelligibility and thus interferes with the ability of the wearer to communicate. The magnitude of this degradation is not well-studied and can vary as a function of numerous parameters. This study investigated the performance degradation of speech intelligibility in low-level noise for different speaker-listener distances and message sets (single words or predictable sentences) that occurred while wearing a respirator compared with not wearing a respirator. Thirteen speaker-listener pairs with normal hearing and speech were used. Speaker-listener separation distances were 0.61, 1.22, 1.83, 2.44, 3.05, and 3.66 m (2, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12 ft) for the respirator condition and 1.22, 2.44, 3.05, 6.1, 9.15, and 12.2 m (4, 8, 10, 20, 30, and 40 ft) for the no-respirator condition. The means of the scores were used to determine the speech performance rating for both the single-word and sentence comprehension tests. The performance rating expresses the percentage of performance that can be expected while wearing a respirator compared with not wearing a respirator. Scores were interpolated linearly at distances at which no data were obtained. As expected, the speech performance rating was higher for the sentence comprehension test than for the single-word comprehension test at each distance. At a distance of 12.2 m, the speech performance rating for the sentence comprehension was 70%. For the single-word comprehension test, the speech performance rating was zero for distances greater than 9.1 m.

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9586201     DOI: 10.1080/15428119891010523

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Ind Hyg Assoc J        ISSN: 0002-8894


  4 in total

1.  Speech intelligibility test methodology applied to powered air-purifying respirators used in healthcare.

Authors:  Susan Xu; Jeremy Simons; Patrick Yorio; Dana Rottach; Ziqing Zhuang; Lewis Radonovich
Journal:  J Occup Environ Hyg       Date:  2020-12-07       Impact factor: 2.155

2.  Acoustic voice characteristics with and without wearing a facemask.

Authors:  Duy Duong Nguyen; Patricia McCabe; Donna Thomas; Alison Purcell; Maree Doble; Daniel Novakovic; Antonia Chacon; Catherine Madill
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-03-11       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 3.  Respirator masks protect health but impact performance: a review.

Authors:  Arthur T Johnson
Journal:  J Biol Eng       Date:  2016-02-09       Impact factor: 4.355

4.  Face mask type affects audiovisual speech intelligibility and subjective listening effort in young and older adults.

Authors:  Violet A Brown; Kristin J Van Engen; Jonathan E Peelle
Journal:  Cogn Res Princ Implic       Date:  2021-07-18
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.