Literature DB >> 9585292

The effects of cervical epidural anesthesia with bupivacaine on pulmonary function in conscious patients.

X Capdevila1, P Biboulet, J Rubenovitch, O Serre-Cousine, P Peray, J Deschodt, F d'Athis.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Cervical epidural anesthesia (CEA) can affect diaphragmatic function. We investigated the effects of CEA on the diaphragm muscle performance, breathing pattern, and respiratory drive of 10 healthy patients undergoing hand surgery before and after the administration of 0.25% and 0.375% bupivacaine. The lung volumes and flows, respiratory rate (RR), minute ventilation, respiratory cycle time, occlusion pressure, maximal inspiratory pressure (MIP), and hand grip strength were determined. ETCO2 and SpO2 were continuously monitored. The diaphragmatic excursion was evaluated using ultrasonography. Although CEA allowed painless hand rehabilitation, both 0.25% and 0.375% bupivacaine impaired diaphragmatic excursion, with values decreasing from 5.6 to 4.4 and 3.3 cm (P < 0.05), respectively, during forced sniff maneuvers. In the 0.25% and 0.375% bupivacaine groups, the values of MIP decreased from 74 to 56 and 44 cm H2O, forced vital capacity decreased from 3.8 to 3.2 and 2.8 L, and hand grip strength decreased from 43.3 to 27.8 and 20.5 kg force, respectively (P < 0.05). The tidal volume decreased from 0.8 to 0.6 and 0.5 L in the 0.25% and 0.375% bupivacaine groups, respectively, the RR increased from 14 to 18 breaths/min in both groups, and the occlusion pressure increased from 1.5 to 2.1 and 2.9 cm H2O in the 0.25% and 0.375% bupivacaine groups, respectively (P < 0.05). ETCO2 increased from 35.2 to 38.1 and 39.3 mm Hg in the 0.25% and 0.375% bupivacaine groups, respectively, and SpO2 decreased by 2% +/- 1% in the 0.375% bupivacaine group. CEA affects diaphragmatic function and the resulting lung volumes and MIP values. The observed alterations in breathing pattern and the significant increase in ventilatory drive may be caused by changes in the diaphragmatic muscle tension and an augmented CO2 load. In conclusion, we do not recommend this technique for routine postoperative hand rehabilitation using the studied bupivacaine concentrations. IMPLICATIONS: We studied cervical epidural anesthesia in healthy patients undergoing hand surgery. The technique allowed painless rehabilitation but affected breathing pattern, diaphragmatic function, and respiratory drive. We cannot recommend this technique for routine clinical use.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9585292     DOI: 10.1097/00000539-199805000-00024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesth Analg        ISSN: 0003-2999            Impact factor:   5.108


  6 in total

1.  Giant Haemangioma Excision Under Cervical Epidural Anaesthesia: A Viable Alternative to General Anaesthesia.

Authors:  Samit Parua; Dipika Choudhury; Mridu Paban Nath
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2016-11-01

2.  Cervical epidural analgesia combined with general anesthesia for head and neck cancer surgery: A randomized study.

Authors:  Anjali Kochhar; Jahanara Banday; Zainab Ahmad; Pratibha Panjiar; Homay Vajifdar
Journal:  J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2020-06-15

Review 3.  Epidural anesthesia and pulmonary function.

Authors:  Harald Groeben
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 2.078

4.  Comparison of three different formulations of local anaesthetics for cervical epidural anaesthesia during thyroid surgery.

Authors:  Gaurav Jain; Pranav Bansal; Girdhari L Garg; Dinesh K Singh; Ghanshyam Yadav
Journal:  Indian J Anaesth       Date:  2012-03

5.  Evaluation of lung function and clinical features of interlaminar cervical epidural steroid injections: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Ji Seon Chae; Won-Joong Kim; Gi Year Lee; Yong Ju Choi
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2022-06       Impact factor: 1.573

6.  Comparative evaluation of dexmedetomidine and clonidine with low dose ropivacaine in cervical epidural anesthesia for modified radical mastectomy: A prospective randomized, double-blind study.

Authors:  Shivakumar M Channabasappa; Gopinath H Venkatarao; Shobha Girish; Nandakishore K Lahoti
Journal:  Anesth Essays Res       Date:  2016 Jan-Apr
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.