Literature DB >> 9584809

Levels of microbial contamination on surgical instruments.

W A Rutala1, M F Gergen, J F Jones, D J Weber.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To ascertain the microbial load and type of organisms on used surgical instruments following standard cleaning, which consisted of the use of a washer sterilizer followed by sonic cleaning.
DESIGN: In this prospective experimental study, used surgical instruments were immersed in Peptamin Tween broth, the broth agitated, and then filtered through a 0.45 microm filter. Quantitative cultures were performed, and all microbes were identified by using standard techniques.
SETTING: This study was conducted at a 660-bed university hospital.
RESULTS: The microbial load remaining on used surgical instruments after cleaning was as follows: 36 (72%) instruments 0 to 10 colony-forming units (CFU), 7 (14%) instruments 11 to 100 CFU, and 7 (14%) instruments > 100 CFU. Organisms contaminating the instruments included coagulase-negative staphylococcus (56%) followed by Bacillus (22%) and diphtheroids (14%). No other microbes were isolated from more than 4% of the instruments.
CONCLUSION: Most used nonlumen surgical instruments contain less than 100 CFU of relatively nonpathogenic microorganisms after cleaning. This suggests that new low-temperature sterilization technologies are likely to be highly effective in preventing cross-transmission of infection via nonlumen medical instruments.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9584809     DOI: 10.1016/s0196-6553(98)80034-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Infect Control        ISSN: 0196-6553            Impact factor:   2.918


  5 in total

1.  Efficacy of soaking in 70% isopropyl alcohol on aerobic bacterial decontamination of surgical instruments and gloves for serial mouse laparotomies.

Authors:  Jessica N Keen; MaryKay Austin; Li-Shan Huang; Susan Messing; Jeffrey D Wyatt
Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 1.232

2.  A case study of a real-time evaluation of the risk of disease transmission associated with a failure to follow recommended sterilization procedures.

Authors:  Curtis J Donskey; Marian Yowler; Yngve Falck-Ytter; Sirisha Kundrapu; Robert A Salata; William A Rutala
Journal:  Antimicrob Resist Infect Control       Date:  2014-01-21       Impact factor: 4.887

Review 3.  Reprocessing and reuse of urological armamentarium: How correct are we!

Authors:  Krutik Vipulbhai Raval; Rajeev Chaudhari; Shahil Rameshbhai Khant; Omkar Joglekar; Dipen Patel
Journal:  Urol Ann       Date:  2017 Apr-Jun

4.  Pilot study: Internally cooled orthopedic drills - standard sterilization is not enough?

Authors:  Tomislav Bruketa; Goran Augustin; Selma Pintarić; Branka Šeol-Martinec; Ivan Dobrić; Bore Bakota
Journal:  Acta Clin Croat       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 0.780

5.  Evaluation of the sterilization efficacy of domestic electric drills used in orthopaedic surgeries.

Authors:  Vania Regina Goveia; Flavia Morais Gomes Pinto; Irene Alexeevna Machoshvili; Thereza Christina Vessoni Penna; Kazuko Uchikawa Graziano
Journal:  Braz J Microbiol       Date:  2009-09-01       Impact factor: 2.476

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.