Literature DB >> 9584385

Healing bone using recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein 2 and copolymer.

C A Kirker-Head1, T N Gerhart, R Armstrong, S H Schelling, L A Carmel.   

Abstract

Middiaphyseal 2.5-cm segmental defects in the right femurs of 12 sheep were stabilized with stainless steel plates and implanted with (1) 2 mg recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein 2 and poly[D,L-(lactide-co-glycolide)] bioerodible polymer with autologous blood (n = 7), (2) 4 mg recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein 2 and poly[D,L-(lactide-co-glycolide)] and blood (n = 3), or (3) poly[D,L-(lactide-co-glycolide)] and blood only (n = 2). Bone healing was evaluated for 1 year using clinical, radiographic, gross pathologic, and histologic techniques. Union occurred in three sheep in Group 1, two in Group 2, and none in Group 3. In the animals that healed, new bone first was visible radiographically between Weeks 2 and 6 after implantation; new bone mineral content equaled that of the intact femur not surgically treated by Week 16; recanalization of the medullary cavity approached completion at Week 52; and at necropsy the surgical treated femurs were rigidly healed, the poly[D,L-(lactide-co-glycolide)] was resorbed completely, and woven and lamellar bone bridged the defect site. In two Group 1 sheep euthanized at Weeks 2 and 6, polymer particles were permeated by occasional multinucleated giant cells. Some plasma cells, lymphocytes, and neutrophils were present locally. The poly[D,L-(lactide-co-glycolide)] tended to fragment during surgical implantation. Despite these observations, the recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein 2/poly[D,L-(lactide-co-glycolide)] implant was able to heal large segmental bone defects in this demanding model.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9584385     DOI: 10.1097/00003086-199804000-00026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  6 in total

1.  Osteogenic protein-1 delivered by hydroxyapatite-coated implants improves bone ingrowth in extracortical bone bridging.

Authors:  Neil Saran; Renwen Zhang; Robert E Turcotte
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-09-28       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 2.  How does the pathophysiological context influence delivery of bone growth factors?

Authors:  Xiaohua Yu; Darilis Suárez-González; Andrew S Khalil; William L Murphy
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  2014-10-17       Impact factor: 15.470

3.  The enhancement of osteogenesis by nano-fibrous scaffolds incorporating rhBMP-7 nanospheres.

Authors:  Guobao Wei; Qiming Jin; William V Giannobile; Peter X Ma
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2007-01-08       Impact factor: 12.479

Review 4.  Segmental long bone regeneration guided by degradable synthetic polymeric scaffolds.

Authors:  Xiaowen Xu; Jie Song
Journal:  Biomater Transl       Date:  2020-12-28

5.  Evaluation of an injectable, photopolymerizable three-dimensional scaffold based on D: ,L: -lactide and epsilon-caprolactone in a tibial goat model.

Authors:  Geert Vertenten; Lieven Vlaminck; Tomasz Gorski; Elke Schreurs; Wim Van Den Broeck; Luc Duchateau; Etienne Schacht; Frank Gasthuys
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2008-02-29       Impact factor: 3.896

Review 6.  Systematic Review of the Preclinical Technology Readiness of Orthopedic Gene Therapy and Outlook for Clinical Translation.

Authors:  Piers Wilkinson; Ilya Y Bozo; Thomas Braxton; Peter Just; Elena Jones; Roman V Deev; Peter V Giannoudis; Georg A Feichtinger
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2021-03-17
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.