Literature DB >> 9583754

When somatic information threatens, catastrophic thinking enhances attentional interference.

G Crombez1, C Eccleston, F Baeyens, P Eelen.   

Abstract

Styles of catastrophic thinking about pain have been related to an inability to divert attention away from pain. We investigated whether pain catastrophizers displayed high attentional interference during a threatening low-intensity electrocutaneous stimulus (ES). In Experiment 1, 44 undergraduates performed a tone discrimination task whilst experiencing several times an ES on the left or right arms. Tones were also presented 250 ms and 750 ms after ES onset. Participants were threatened that a high-intensity painful stimulus would occur at one site. As predicted, pain catastrophizers displayed pronounced task interference immediately after threat stimulus onset. In Experiment 2, threat was induced in 36 undergraduates by informing them that an ES excites pain fibres. Again, catastrophizers had marked interference immediately after onset. The results are discussed in terms of how catastrophizing amplifies somatosensory information and primes fear mechanisms.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9583754     DOI: 10.1016/s0304-3959(97)00219-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pain        ISSN: 0304-3959            Impact factor:   6.961


  68 in total

Review 1.  The prevalence of post-traumatic stress disorder in chronic pain patients.

Authors:  Timothy J Sharp
Journal:  Curr Pain Headache Rep       Date:  2004-04

2.  What do you expect? Catastrophizing mediates associations between expectancies and pain-facilitatory processes.

Authors:  Junie S Carriere; Marc Olivier Martel; Samantha M Meints; Marise C Cornelius; Robert R Edwards
Journal:  Eur J Pain       Date:  2019-01-09       Impact factor: 3.931

Review 3.  How does distraction work in the management of pain?

Authors:  Malcolm H Johnson
Journal:  Curr Pain Headache Rep       Date:  2005-04

4.  Subgrouping for patients with low back pain: a multidimensional approach incorporating cluster analysis and the STarT Back Screening Tool.

Authors:  Jason M Beneciuk; Michael E Robinson; Steven Z George
Journal:  J Pain       Date:  2014-10-22       Impact factor: 5.820

5.  Is touch gating due to sensory or cognitive interference?

Authors:  Daniel E Harper; Mark Hollins
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2012-03-13       Impact factor: 6.961

6.  Pain catastrophizing, pain intensity, and dyadic adjustment influence patient and partner depression in metastatic breast cancer.

Authors:  Hoda Badr; Megan J Shen
Journal:  Clin J Pain       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 3.442

7.  Pain differs from non-painful attention-demanding or stressful tasks in its effect on postural control patterns of trunk muscles.

Authors:  G Lorimer Moseley; M K Nicholas; Paul W Hodges
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-12-19       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Pain moderates changes in psychological flexibility but not substance use symptoms during substance use disorder treatment.

Authors:  Katherine T Foster; Colleen Ehrnstrom; Stephen Chermack; Avinash Hosanagar
Journal:  Psychiatry Res       Date:  2016-08-05       Impact factor: 3.222

9.  Pain assessment in hospitalized older adults with dementia and delirium.

Authors:  Christina May Paulson; Todd Monroe; Lorraine C Mion
Journal:  J Gerontol Nurs       Date:  2014-05-02       Impact factor: 1.254

10.  Spinal segmental stabilisation exercises for chronic low back pain: programme adherence and its influence on clinical outcome.

Authors:  Anne F Mannion; Daniel Helbling; Natascha Pulkovski; Haiko Sprott
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-07-17       Impact factor: 3.134

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.