Literature DB >> 9583574

Temperature sensitivity of the body surface over the life span.

J C Stevens1, K K Choo.   

Abstract

Detection thresholds to warming and cooling were measured in 13 regions of the body in 60 adults aged between 18 and 88 years. From these thresholds were constructed maps of thermal sensitivity homologous to body maps of spatial acuity (in the older literature two-point discrimination), long known to the somatosensory scientist. Maps of cold and warm sensitivity for young, middle-aged and elderly adults, show how sensitivity changes with age in the various body regions. Three characteristics emerge, irrespective of age: (1) sensitivity varies approximately 100-fold over the body surface. The face, especially near the mouth, is exquisitely sensitive, the extremities, by comparison, poor, other regions, intermediate. (2) All body regions are more sensitive to cold than to warm. (3) The better a region is at detecting cold, the better it is at detecting warm. With age, thermal sensitivity declines. The greatest changes take place in the extremities, especially the foot, where thresholds often become too large to measure. Central regions give up their sensitivity with age more slowly, and even (as in the lips) inconsequentially. Similar age-related changes have also previously been shown to characterize spatial acuity.

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9583574     DOI: 10.1080/08990229870925

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Somatosens Mot Res        ISSN: 0899-0220            Impact factor:   1.111


  36 in total

1.  Inert gas narcosis has no influence on thermo-tactile sensation.

Authors:  Miroljub Jakovljević; Gaj Vidmar; Igor B Mekjavic
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2011-09-20       Impact factor: 3.078

2.  Local thermal unpleasantness and discomfort prediction in the vicinity of thermoneutrality.

Authors:  Nicolas Pellerin; Anne Deschuyteneer; Victor Candas
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 3.078

3.  Age differences in orofacial sensory thresholds.

Authors:  M W Heft; M E Robinson
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  2010-07-22       Impact factor: 6.116

4.  Ageing and thermal responses during passive heat exposure: sweating and sensory aspects.

Authors:  Andre Dufour; Victor Candas
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2007-01-23       Impact factor: 3.078

5.  Thermal cues and the perception of force.

Authors:  Jessica Galie; Lynette A Jones
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-08-05       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Spatial summation of thermal sensations depends on skin type and skin sensitivity.

Authors:  Ruth Defrin; Laura Petrini; Lars Arendt-Nielsen
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-07-17       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Thermal face protection delays finger cooling and improves thermal comfort during cold air exposure.

Authors:  Catherine O'Brien; John W Castellani; Michael N Sawka
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2011-04-03       Impact factor: 3.078

8.  Thermal quantitative sensory testing in burning mouth syndrome.

Authors:  Anne Wolowski; N Schwarzbach; H Hörning
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2020-10-15       Impact factor: 3.573

9.  Interoceptive awareness declines with age.

Authors:  Sahib S Khalsa; David Rudrauf; Daniel Tranel
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2009-07-06       Impact factor: 4.016

10.  Skin cooling aids cerebrovascular function more effectively under severe than moderate heat stress.

Authors:  Rebekah A I Lucas; Philip N Ainslie; Jui-Lin Fan; Luke C Wilson; Kate N Thomas; James D Cotter
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2009-11-28       Impact factor: 3.078

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.