Literature DB >> 9583423

Environmental tobacco smoke and lung cancer in nonsmokers: does time since exposure play a role?

F Nyberg1, V Agrenius, K Svartengren, C Svensson, G Pershagen.   

Abstract

We conducted a population-based case-control study in Stockholm during 1989-1995 to investigate the risk of lung cancer from exposure to environmental tobacco smoke. The study base consisted of persons above 30 years of age resident in Stockholm County who had never smoked regularly (that is, one cigarette or more daily for 1 year). Cases of lung cancer were identified at the three major county hospitals responsible for diagnosis and treatment of lung cancer. A total of 124 cases (35 men and 89 women) and 235 population controls (72 men and 163 women) participated. The never-smoking status was validated by interviews with next-of-kin. The relative risk associated with ever-cohabiting with a smoking spouse was 1.2 [95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.7-1.9]. Ever-exposure at work to environmental tobacco smoke carried a relative risk of 1.6 (95% CI = 0.9-2.9). Risks tended to be more elevated in high-exposure groups and with recent exposures. Both sources of environmental tobacco smoke seemed important, and considerable misclassification of total exposure occurred for each variable used separately, in particular for the less common spousal exposure. For those currently exposed to environmental tobacco smoke from the spouse, at work, or both, the relative risk was 2.6 (95% CI = 1.0-6.5). Our data imply that information from major sources of environmental tobacco smoke should be combined to avoid important misclassification and that timing of exposure should also be taken into consideration.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9583423

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Epidemiology        ISSN: 1044-3983            Impact factor:   4.822


  5 in total

1.  Lung cancer risk and workplace exposure to environmental tobacco smoke.

Authors:  Leslie Stayner; James Bena; Annie J Sasco; Randall Smith; Kyle Steenland; Michaela Kreuzer; Kurt Straif
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2007-01-31       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Passive smoking and lung cancer. Strength of evidence on passive smoking and lung cancer is overstated.

Authors:  P Lee
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-08-01

3.  Exposure to secondhand tobacco smoke and lung cancer by histological type: a pooled analysis of the International Lung Cancer Consortium (ILCCO).

Authors:  Claire H Kim; Yuan-Chin Amy Lee; Rayjean J Hung; Sheila R McNallan; Michele L Cote; Wei-Yen Lim; Shen-Chih Chang; Jin Hee Kim; Donatella Ugolini; Ying Chen; Triantafillos Liloglou; Angeline S Andrew; Tracy Onega; Eric J Duell; John K Field; Philip Lazarus; Loic Le Marchand; Monica Neri; Paolo Vineis; Chikako Kiyohara; Yun-Chul Hong; Hal Morgenstern; Keitaro Matsuo; Kazuo Tajima; David C Christiani; John R McLaughlin; Vladimir Bencko; Ivana Holcatova; Paolo Boffetta; Paul Brennan; Eleonora Fabianova; Lenka Foretova; Vladimir Janout; Jolanta Lissowska; Dana Mates; Peter Rudnai; Neonila Szeszenia-Dabrowska; Anush Mukeria; David Zaridze; Adeline Seow; Ann G Schwartz; Ping Yang; Zuo-Feng Zhang
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2014-03-25       Impact factor: 7.396

Review 4.  Epidemiologic evidence for workplace ETS as a risk factor for lung cancer among nonsmokers: specific risk estimates.

Authors:  P Reynolds
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 9.031

5.  Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review in Environmental Tobacco Smoke Risk of Female Lung Cancer by Research Type.

Authors:  Xue Ni; Ning Xu; Qiang Wang
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2018-06-27       Impact factor: 3.390

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.