Literature DB >> 9583334

Treatment decision making and adjustment to breast cancer: a longitudinal study.

A L Stanton1, M A Estes, N C Estes, C L Cameron, S Danoff-Burg, L M Irving.   

Abstract

This study monitored women (N = 76) with breast cancer from diagnosis through 1 year, and tested constructs from subjective expected utility theory with regard to their ability to predict patients' choice of surgical treatment as well as psychological distress and well-being over time. Women's positive expectancies for the consequences of treatment generally were maintained in favorable perceptions of outcome in several realms (i.e., physician agreement, likelihood of cancer cure or recurrence, self-evaluation, likelihood of additional treatment, partner support for option, attractiveness to partner). Assessed before the surgical decision-making appointment, women's expectancies for consequences of the treatment options, along with age, correctly classified 94% of the sample with regard to election of mastectomy versus breast-conserving procedures. Calculated from the point of decision making to 3 months later, expectancy disconfirmations and value discrepancies concerning particular treatment consequences predicted psychological adjustment 3 months and 1 year after diagnosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9583334     DOI: 10.1037//0022-006x.66.2.313

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol        ISSN: 0022-006X


  11 in total

1.  Understanding surgery choices for breast cancer: how might the Theory of Planned Behaviour and the Common Sense Model contribute to decision support interventions?

Authors:  Stephanie Sivell; Adrian Edwards; Glyn Elwyn; Antony S R Manstead
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 3.377

2.  The Chinese Medical Interview Satisfaction Scale-revised (C-MISS-R): development and validation.

Authors:  W W T Lam; R Fielding; Louis Chow; Miranda Chan; Gabriel M Leung; Ella Y Y Ho
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 4.147

3.  Breast-conserving surgery in Hong Kong Chinese women.

Authors:  Dacita Suen; Lorraine Chow; Ava Kwong
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  Psychiatric morbidity among Egyptian breast cancer patients and their partners and its impact on surgical decision-making.

Authors:  Mohamed A El-Hadidy; Waleed Elnahas; Mohamed Af Hegazy; Mohamed T Hafez; Basel Refky; Khaled M Abdel Wahab
Journal:  Breast Cancer (Dove Med Press)       Date:  2012-03-06

5.  Project connect online: randomized trial of an internet-based program to chronicle the cancer experience and facilitate communication.

Authors:  Annette L Stanton; Elizabeth H Thompson; Catherine M Crespi; John S Link; James R Waisman
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-08-12       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  A longitudinal investigation of coping strategies and quality of life among younger women with breast cancer.

Authors:  Suzanne C Danhauer; Sybil L Crawford; Deborah F Farmer; Nancy E Avis
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2009-03-24

7.  'They're doing surgery on two people': a meta-ethnography of the influences on couples' treatment decision making for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Kate Schumm; Zoe Skea; Lorna McKee; James N'Dow
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2010-09-23       Impact factor: 3.377

8.  Measuring decision quality: psychometric evaluation of a new instrument for breast cancer surgery.

Authors:  Karen R Sepucha; Jeffrey K Belkora; Yuchiao Chang; Carol Cosenza; Carrie A Levin; Beverly Moy; Ann Partridge; Clara N Lee
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2012-06-08       Impact factor: 2.796

9.  Attitudes and Decisional Conflict Regarding Breast Reconstruction Among Breast Cancer Patients.

Authors:  Sharon L Manne; Neal Topham; Laurie Kirstein; Shannon Myers Virtue; Kristin Brill; Katie A Devine; Tina Gajda; Sara Frederick; Katie Darabos; Kristen Sorice
Journal:  Cancer Nurs       Date:  2016 Nov/Dec       Impact factor: 2.760

10.  Chemotherapy for advanced breast cancer: what influences oncologists' decision-making?

Authors:  E A Grunfeld; A J Ramirez; E J Maher; D Peach; T Young; I P Albery; M A Richards
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2001-05-04       Impact factor: 7.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.