Literature DB >> 9583252

Assessment of postneonatal growth in VLBW infants: selection of growth references and age adjustment for prematurity.

Z Wang1, R S Sauve.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To assess growth outcomes of VLBW infants using different growth references and to validate the practice of age adjustment for prematurity in the growth assessment for VLBW infants.
METHODS: Longitudinal growth data of 514 VLBW infants from 4 to 36 months of adjusted age were analyzed separately based on chronological and adjusted age and by comparison with three growth references.
RESULTS: More infants were labelled as having "subnormal growth" assessed on chronological age than on adjusted age throughout the first three years of life. The proportions of subnormal growth determined using a Canadian and the WHO reference for breastfed infants were similar; they were different from those obtained using the NCHS/WHO reference.
CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggested that the interpretations of growth in VLBW infants vary substantially depending on which reference is used. The age adjustment for prematurity makes substantial difference in identifying subnormal growth in VLBW infants. The adjustment should be carried out throughout the first three years of life.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9583252      PMCID: PMC6990302     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Public Health        ISSN: 0008-4263


  21 in total

1.  Growth and dietary status of preterm and term infants during the first two years of life.

Authors:  R S Sauve; J H Geggie
Journal:  Can J Public Health       Date:  1991 Mar-Apr

2.  Growth status and growth rates of a varied sample of low birth weight, preterm infants: a longitudinal cohort from birth to three years of age.

Authors:  P H Casey; H C Kraemer; J Bernbaum; M W Yogman; J C Sells
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 4.406

3.  Growth achievement of very low birth weight premature children at school age.

Authors:  G Ross; E G Lipper; P A Auld
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 4.406

4.  Growth and very low birth weight.

Authors:  W H Kitchen; G W Ford; L W Doyle
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 3.791

5.  Comparison of the use of Tanner and Whitehouse, NCHS, and Cambridge standards in infancy.

Authors:  C M Wright; A Waterston; A Aynsley-Green
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 3.791

6.  Infant growth charts.

Authors:  K Cooney; U Pathak; A Watson
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 3.791

7.  Natural growth in children born small for gestational age with and without catch-up growth.

Authors:  K Albertsson-Wikland; J Karlberg
Journal:  Acta Paediatr Suppl       Date:  1994-04

8.  Physical growth: National Center for Health Statistics percentiles.

Authors:  P V Hamill; T A Drizd; C L Johnson; R B Reed; A F Roche; W M Moore
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  1979-03       Impact factor: 7.045

9.  Monthly growth status from a longitudinal study of Canadian infants.

Authors:  S M Guo; A F Roche; D L Yeung
Journal:  Can J Public Health       Date:  1990 May-Jun

10.  The illusion of catch-up growth in premature infants. Use of the growth index and age correction.

Authors:  W Karniski; C Blair; J S Vitucci
Journal:  Am J Dis Child       Date:  1987-05
View more
  6 in total

1.  Is paternal age associated with an increased risk of low birthweight, preterm delivery, and multiple birth?

Authors:  Suzanne C Tough; Alexandra J Faber; Lawrence W Svenson; David W Johnston
Journal:  Can J Public Health       Date:  2003 Mar-Apr

2.  A health professional's guide for using the new WHO growth charts.

Authors: 
Journal:  Paediatr Child Health       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 2.253

Review 3.  Update on well-baby and well-child care from 0 to 5 years: What's new in the Rourke Baby Record?

Authors:  Leslie Rourke; Denis Leduc; Evelyn Constantin; Sarah Carsley; James Rourke
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 3.275

4.  Effect of Correcting the Postnatal Age of Preterm-Born Children on Measures of Associations Between Infant Length-for-Age z Scores and Mid-Childhood Outcomes.

Authors:  Nandita Perumal; Daniel E Roth; Donald C Cole; Stanley H Zlotkin; Johnna Perdrizet; Aluisio J D Barros; Ina S Santos; Alicia Matijasevich; Diego G Bassani
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2021-02-01       Impact factor: 4.897

5.  A new growth chart for preterm babies: Babson and Benda's chart updated with recent data and a new format.

Authors:  Tanis R Fenton
Journal:  BMC Pediatr       Date:  2003-12-16       Impact factor: 2.125

6.  Effect of correcting for gestational age at birth on population prevalence of early childhood undernutrition.

Authors:  Daniel E Roth; Diego G Bassani; Nandita Perumal; Johnna Perdrizet; Aluísio J D Barros; Iná S Santos; Alicia Matijasevich
Journal:  Emerg Themes Epidemiol       Date:  2018-02-06
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.