Literature DB >> 9581655

Ethanol reward and aversion in mice bred for sensitivity to ethanol withdrawal.

J A Chester1, F O Risinger, C L Cunningham.   

Abstract

The present study examined mice selectively bred for sensitivity to ethanol withdrawal for differences in the conditioned place preference (CPP) and conditioned taste aversion (CTA) paradigms. Withdrawal Seizure-Prone (WSP) and Withdrawal Seizure-Resistant (WSR) mice and High Alcohol Withdrawal (HAW) and Low Alcohol Withdrawal (LAW) mice were selectively bred for differences in chronic and acute ethanol withdrawal, respectively. For the CPP experiment, male HAW and LAW (generation 5) mice received four pairings of ethanol (2 g/kg), with a distinctive floor stimulus. On intervening days, mice received saline paired with an alternate floor type. During the preference test, all mice received an injection of saline before 60-min access to both floor types. HAW mice showed conditioned preference for the ethanol-paired floor, whereas LAW mice did not. For the CTA experiments, male HAW, LAW, WSP, and WSR mice were adapted to a 2-hr/day water restriction regimen and subsequently received ethanol injections (0, 2, 2.5, or 4 g/kg, i.p.) immediately after 1-hr access to a NaCl-flavored solution. Dose-dependent reductions in NaCl intake reflected the development of CTA in both HAW/LAW and WSP/WSR lines. However, a smaller magnitude of CTA was observed in WSP mice relative to WSR mice after the first ethanol-NaCl pairing. WSP/WSR mice showed similar reductions of NaCl intake on subsequent conditioning trials. Overall, these data suggest that HAW mice selectively bred for high sensitivity to acute ethanol withdrawal are more sensitive to the rewarding effects of ethanol in the CPP paradigm. This outcome is consistent with a previous study showing greater CPP in WSP mice relative to WSR mice. In the CTA paradigm, sensitivity to ethanol withdrawal in the HAW/ LAW selected lines does not appear to be genetically correlated with sensitivity to the aversive properties of ethanol. However, the difference in acquisition of CTA in WSP/WSR lines suggest that some genes determining ethanol withdrawal severity may also influence initial sensitivity to ethanol's aversive effects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9581655

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res        ISSN: 0145-6008            Impact factor:   3.455


  19 in total

1.  The role of endogenous dynorphin in ethanol-induced state-dependent CPP.

Authors:  Khanh Nguyen; Andy Tseng; Paul Marquez; Abdul Hamid; Kabirullah Lutfy
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2011-10-29       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  The influence of selection for ethanol withdrawal severity on traits associated with ethanol self-administration and reinforcement.

Authors:  Matthew M Ford; Andrea M Fretwell; Allison M J Anacker; John C Crabbe; Gregory P Mark; Deborah A Finn
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2010-11-10       Impact factor: 3.455

Review 3.  Human and laboratory rodent low response to alcohol: is better consilience possible?

Authors:  John C Crabbe; Richard L Bell; Cindy L Ehlers
Journal:  Addict Biol       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 4.280

4.  Genetic relationship between ethanol-induced conditioned place preference and other ethanol phenotypes in 15 inbred mouse strains.

Authors:  Christopher L Cunningham
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2014-05-19       Impact factor: 1.912

5.  The effects of nicotine on ethanol-induced conditioned taste aversions in Long-Evans rats.

Authors:  Jennifer A Rinker; Gregory D Busse; Peter G Roma; Scott A Chen; Christina S Barr; Anthony L Riley
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2008-01-18       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 6.  Ethanol drinking in rodents: is free-choice drinking related to the reinforcing effects of ethanol?

Authors:  Alexis S Green; Nicholas J Grahame
Journal:  Alcohol       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 2.405

7.  Taok2 controls behavioral response to ethanol in mice.

Authors:  D Kapfhamer; S Taylor; M E Zou; J P Lim; V Kharazia; U Heberlein
Journal:  Genes Brain Behav       Date:  2012-08-31       Impact factor: 3.449

8.  Nicotinic acetylcholine receptors containing α6 subunits contribute to alcohol reward-related behaviours.

Authors:  M S Powers; H J Broderick; R M Drenan; J A Chester
Journal:  Genes Brain Behav       Date:  2013-05-07       Impact factor: 3.449

Review 9.  The role of GABA(A) receptors in the acute and chronic effects of ethanol: a decade of progress.

Authors:  Sandeep Kumar; Patrizia Porcu; David F Werner; Douglas B Matthews; Jaime L Diaz-Granados; Rebecca S Helfand; A Leslie Morrow
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2009-05-20       Impact factor: 4.530

10.  Neurotoxic consequences of chronic alcohol withdrawal: expression profiling reveals importance of gender over withdrawal severity.

Authors:  Joel G Hashimoto; Kristine M Wiren
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2007-06-27       Impact factor: 7.853

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.