Literature DB >> 9580407

Maxillary sinus augmentation using different grafting materials and dental implants in monkeys. Part I. Evaluation of anorganic bovine-derived bone matrix.

M B Hürzeler1, C R Quiñones, A Kirsch, C Gloker, P Schüpbach, J R Strub, R G Caffesse.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate clinically, histologically and histometrically the use of anorganic bovine bone matrix (i.e. Bio-oss) as a grafting material for maxillary sinus augmentation procedures. In 4 adult male rhesus monkeys (i.e. Macaca mulatta) the 1st, 2nd and 3rd maxillary molars on one side of the jaws were extracted. The remaining bone between the alveolar crest and the bottom of the sinus was then reduced to 3-4 mm. After 3 months, maxillary sinus augmentation procedures were performed on one side of the jaws in each monkey and the sinuses were grafted with the bovine bone matrix. At that time, 2 IMZ pure titanium plasma coated implants were immediately placed into the augmented sinuses (i.e. simultaneous implants-loaded group). After 4 months, 2 additional similar implants were placed into these previously augmented sinuses (i.e. delayed implants-loaded group). Four months later, the abutment connection was performed and all 4 implants were loaded with a gold-alloy bridge for 6 months (i.e. until sacrifice of the animals). The contralateral side of each monkey received the same treatment with the exception that the extractions were performed 7 months after those in the opposite side and that the implants in this side were not loaded. Thus, 2 additional study groups (i.e. simultaneous implants-unloaded group and delayed implants-unloaded group) were obtained. Clinically, all loaded implants were stable at the day of sacrifice. Histologically, the grafted sinuses exhibited significant bone formation with integration of the bovine bone matrix particles to the new bone. Direct mineralized bone-to-implant contact was greater for the delayed implant placement groups than for the implants installed simultaneously with the sinus augmentation. Furthermore, the percentage of direct mineralized bone-to-implant contact was greater in the residual bone than in the augmented area. It was concluded that the anorganic bovine bone matrix facilitated bone formation and implant osseointegration in the augmented sinuses and that the delayed implant placement in combination with the sinus augmentation procedure seemed to be preferable.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9580407     DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0501.1997.080606.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res        ISSN: 0905-7161            Impact factor:   5.977


  14 in total

1.  Experimental maxillary sinus augmentation using a highly bioactive glass ceramic.

Authors:  Rodrigo Ricci Vivan; Carlos Eduardo Mecca; Claudia Cristina Biguetti; Ana Claudia Muniz Rennó; Roberta Okamoto; Bruno Cavalini Cavenago; Marco Húngaro Duarte; Mariza Akemi Matsumoto
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2015-12-28       Impact factor: 3.896

2.  Comparative in vitro study of the proliferation and growth of ovine osteoblast-like cells on various alloplastic biomaterials manufactured for augmentation and reconstruction of tissue or bone defects.

Authors:  Sandra C Schmitt; Margit Wiedmann-Al-Ahmad; Jens Kuschnierz; Ali Al-Ahmad; Ute Huebner; Rainer Schmelzeisen; Ralf Gutwald
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2007-10-04       Impact factor: 3.896

3.  Incomplete bone formation after sinus augmentation: A case report on radiological findings by computerized tomography at follow-up.

Authors:  Kyung-Shil Lee; Young-Hyuk Kwon; Yeek Herr; Seung-Il Shin; Ji-Yeon Lee; Jong-Hyuk Chung
Journal:  J Periodontal Implant Sci       Date:  2010-12-31       Impact factor: 2.614

Review 4.  Bone augmentation with TiMesh. autologous bone versus autologous bone and bone substitutes. A systematic review.

Authors:  Fabrizio Carini; Salvatore Longoni; Ernesto Amosso; Jacopo Paleari; Stefania Carini; Gianluca Porcaro
Journal:  Ann Stomatol (Roma)       Date:  2014-10-25

5.  Effect of amount of biomaterial used for maxillary sinus lift on volume maintenance of grafts.

Authors:  Luciene-Dornas Mendes; Roberta-Paula-Colen Bustamante; Bruno-César-Ladeira Vidigal; Mario-Nazareno Favato; Flávio-Ricardo Manzi; Mauricio-Greco Cosso; Elton-Gonçalves Zenóbio
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2020-09-01

6.  Search for ideal biomaterials to cultivate human osteoblast-like cells for reconstructive surgery.

Authors:  M Wiedmann-Al-Ahmad; R Gutwald; N-C Gellrich; U Hübner; R Schmelzeisen
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 3.896

7.  Performance of coralline hydroxyapatite in sinus floor augmentation: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Zhi-Bin Luo; Qing-Bin Zhang; Zhao-Qiang Zhang; Dan Chen; Wang-Xiang Yan; Ke-Feng Li; Yu Chen
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2013-01-29       Impact factor: 3.573

8.  Survival rate of Astra Tech implants with maxillary sinus lift.

Authors:  Wook-Jae Yoon; Kyung-In Jeong; Jae-Seek You; Ji-Su Oh; Su-Gwan Kim
Journal:  J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2014-02-25

Review 9.  Bone substitutes for peri-implant defects of postextraction implants.

Authors:  Pâmela Letícia Santos; Jéssica Lemos Gulinelli; Cristino da Silva Telles; Walter Betoni Júnior; Roberta Okamoto; Vivian Chiacchio Buchignani; Thallita Pereira Queiroz
Journal:  Int J Biomater       Date:  2013-12-12

10.  Induction of multinucleated giant cells in response to small sized bovine bone substitute (Bio-Oss™) results in an enhanced early implantation bed vascularization.

Authors:  M Barbeck; S E Udeabor; J Lorenz; A Kubesch; J Choukroun; R A Sader; C J Kirkpatrick; S Ghanaati
Journal:  Ann Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2014 Jul-Dec
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.