Literature DB >> 9579887

The new antiepileptic drugs: a systematic review of their efficacy and tolerability.

A G Marson1, Z A Kadir, J L Hutton, D W Chadwick.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Gabapentin (GBP), lamotrigine (LTG), tiagabine (TGB), topiramate (TPM), vigabatrin (VGB), and zonisamide (ZNS) are all in use as "add-on" treatment for patients with refractory epilepsy. There have been no comparative randomized controlled trials allowing an evidence-based choice between these drugs. We report a series of meta-analyses of randomized placebo-controlled add-on trials in which these drugs have been tested in patients with partial epilepsy. This work provides an estimate of each drug's efficacy and tolerability compared with placebo. These estimates are compared across drugs to give broad estimates of comparative efficacy and tolerability.
METHODS: Trial reports were found by searching Medline, by searching through journals by hand, and by contacting the pharmaceutical industry. The outcomes chosen were the proportion of patients who (a) have a > or = 50% reduction in seizure frequency (50% responders); (b) withdrew from the study (any reason); or (c) reported the following side effects: ataxia, dizziness, fatigue, nausea, or somnolence. Overall odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs; 50% responders) or 99% CIs; side effects) were calculated.
RESULTS: Twenty-nine trials were included, representing 4,091 randomized patients. The ORs for 50% response (95% CI) were GBP, 2.29 (1.53-3.43); LTG, 2.32 (1.47-3.68); TGB, 3.03 (2.01-4.58); TPM, 4.07 (2.87-5.78); VGB, 3.67 (2.44-5.51); and ZNS, 2.7 (1.36-4.47). ORs for discontinuation were GBP, 1.36 (0.75-2.49); LTG, 1.19 (0.79-1.79); TGB, 1.81 (1.21-2.70); TPM, 2.56 (1.64-4.00); VGB, 2.58 (126-5.27); and ZNS, 4.23 (1.71-10.49).
CONCLUSIONS: We have clear evidence that each of these drugs is better than placebo at preventing seizures. When results are compared across drugs, the confidence intervals overlap, and we have no conclusive evidence of differences in efficacy or tolerability. Despite this, the agent that appears most effective may be twice as effective as the agent that appears least effective, and the agent that appears most likely to cause discontinuation may be 4 times more likely to do so than the treatment that appears least likely to do so. Comparative randomized studies are needed further to evaluate these drugs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9579887     DOI: 10.1111/j.1528-1157.1997.tb01251.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Epilepsia        ISSN: 0013-9580            Impact factor:   5.864


  54 in total

1.  The SF-36 as a health status measure for epilepsy: a psychometric assessment.

Authors:  A Jacoby; G A Baker; N Steen; D Buck
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 2.  New antiepileptic drugs.

Authors:  C W Bazil
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 5.081

3.  The management of epilepsy.

Authors:  D Smith; D Chadwick
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 10.154

4.  The cost effectiveness of two new antiepileptic therapies in the absence of direct comparative data: a first approximation.

Authors:  Ben A van Hout; Dennis D Gagnon; Pauline McNulty; Anthony O'Hagan
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 5.  Review of therapeutic options for adjuvant treatment of focal seizures in epilepsy: focus on lacosamide.

Authors:  Juan Luis Becerra; Joaquín Ojeda; Enrique Corredera; Jesús Ruiz Giménez
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2011-12-05       Impact factor: 5.749

6.  NICE guidance on newer drugs for epilepsy in adults.

Authors:  Emilio Perucca
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-05-29

Review 7.  New drugs for the treatment of epilepsy: a practical approach.

Authors:  S Beyenburg; J Bauer; M Reuber
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 2.401

8.  Modelling the risk of visual field loss arising from long-term exposure to the antiepileptic drug vigabatrin: a cross-sectional approach.

Authors:  John M Wild; David L Fone; Saleh Aljarudi; Charlotte Lawthom; Philip E M Smith; Robert G Newcombe; Gareth D Lewis
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 5.749

9.  The adverse event profile of pregabalin across different disorders: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Gaetano Zaccara; Piero Perucca; Pier Franco Gangemi
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2012-01-21       Impact factor: 2.953

Review 10.  Tiagabine add-on for drug-resistant partial epilepsy.

Authors:  Jennifer Pulman; Anthony G Marson; Jane L Hutton
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2012-05-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.