Literature DB >> 9579126

A prospective audit of the usefulness of evacuating proctography.

H J Jones1, R I Swift, H Blake.   

Abstract

Fifty-nine evacuating proctograms were performed over a 4 month period. We sought to identify how useful this technique is in diagnosing the cause of various anorectal symptoms and indicating which treatment option may be beneficial to the patient. The main reasons for referral were faecal soiling (60%) and obstructed defaecation (47%). Of the proctograms, 90% revealed some pathology. The most common abnormalities detected were rectocele (56%), rectal intussusception (39%), enterocele (19%) and rectal prolapse (12%). Of the patients, 45% were treated with an operation specific to the pathology detected on the proctogram; 29% did not require any active treatment and the remainder were managed with biofeedback conditioning or injection sclerotherapy. Evacuating proctography is of value in providing a diagnosis in patients with anorectal symptoms and thereby allowing specific treatment, operative or nonoperative, to be directed to the underlying pathology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9579126      PMCID: PMC2502771     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl        ISSN: 0035-8843            Impact factor:   1.891


  29 in total

1.  A method of computerised isotope dynamic proctography.

Authors:  M Papachrysostomou; T M Griffin; C Ferrington; M V Merrick; A N Smith
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med       Date:  1992

2.  Physiologic and anatomic assessment of patients with rectocele.

Authors:  K Yoshioka; Y Matsui; O Yamada; M Sakaguchi; H Takada; K Hioki; M Yamamoto; M Kitada; I Sawaragi
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 4.585

3.  Rectocele repair. Four years' experience.

Authors:  M W Arnold; W R Stewart; P S Aguilar
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 4.585

4.  Defecography in normal volunteers: results and implications.

Authors:  P J Shorvon; S McHugh; N E Diamant; S Somers; G W Stevenson
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1989-12       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 5.  Female genital prolapse and pelvic floor deficiency.

Authors:  C N Hudson
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  1988-08       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  Defecography in patients with anorectal disorders. Which findings are clinically relevant?

Authors:  R J Felt-Bersma; W J Luth; J J Janssen; S G Meuwissen
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1990-04       Impact factor: 4.585

Review 7.  Anorectal physiology and pathophysiology.

Authors:  W E Whitehead; M M Schuster
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  1987-06       Impact factor: 10.864

8.  Injury to innervation of pelvic floor sphincter musculature in childbirth.

Authors:  S J Snooks; M Setchell; M Swash; M M Henry
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1984-09-08       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  Abdominal rectopexy for rectal prolapse: a comparison of techniques.

Authors:  G S Duthie; D C Bartolo
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 6.939

10.  Anal endosonography in the investigation of faecal incontinence.

Authors:  P J Law; M A Kamm; C I Bartram
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 6.939

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.