Literature DB >> 9578249

UK National Third Molar project: the initial report.

S F Worrall1, K Riden, R Haskell, A M Corrigan.   

Abstract

The National Third Molar (NTM) project was set up to assess current clinical practice in the UK concerning the management of third molar teeth. Patients were recruited from both hospital and general dental practice. During the one month study period 9248 patients with 26,577 third molars were recruited. In this report we present the findings in the 8298 patients with 25,001 third molars who were referred to hospital for assessment. Over half of all patients referred for assessment had either no extractions or a single third molar extracted. Less than a quarter of all patients referred underwent removal of all four third molars. Twenty per cent of all third molars assessed were not extracted. Of all lower third molars listed for extraction, 9574 (78%) were associated with symptoms or disease. Pericoronitis was the commonest indication for extraction and was cited in 39.5% of all extractions. Almost 70% of third molar extractions were done under general anaesthesia while less than a quarter were performed under local anaesthesia alone.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9578249     DOI: 10.1016/s0266-4356(98)90740-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg        ISSN: 0266-4356            Impact factor:   1.651


  20 in total

1.  [Surgical extraction of wisdom teeth].

Authors:  M Kunkel; J Becker; P Boehme; P Engel; G Göz; D Haessler; D Heidemann; E Hellwig; I Kopp; B Kreusser; H-Ch Lauer; H Luckey; E Reinhard; P Schopf; R Singer; H Terheyden; J C Türp; M Weber; D Weingart; R Werkmeister; W Wagner
Journal:  Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir       Date:  2006-07

Review 2.  Impacted wisdom teeth.

Authors:  Thomas B Dodson; Srinivas M Susarla
Journal:  BMJ Clin Evid       Date:  2010-04-08

3.  Prophylactic removal of impacted mandibular third molars: a systematic review and economic evaluation.

Authors:  Juliet Hounsome; Gerlinde Pilkington; James Mahon; Angela Boland; Sophie Beale; Eleanor Kotas; Tara Renton; Rumona Dickson
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 4.014

Review 4.  Impacted wisdom teeth.

Authors:  Thomas B Dodson; Srinivas M Susarla
Journal:  BMJ Clin Evid       Date:  2014-08-29

5.  International benchmarking of hospitalisations for impacted teeth: a 10-year retrospective study from the United Kingdom, France and Australia.

Authors:  A A Anjrini; E Kruger; M Tennant
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 1.626

6.  Oral health-related quality of life following third molar surgery with either oral administration or submucosal injection of prednisolone.

Authors:  Adebayo Aremu Ibikunle; Wasiu Lanre Adeyemo; Akinola Ladipo Ladeinde
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2016-07-22

7.  Risk factors associated with oroantral perforation during surgical removal of maxillary third molar teeth.

Authors:  Takumi Hasegawa; Akira Tachibana; Daisuke Takeda; Eiji Iwata; Satomi Arimoto; Akiko Sakakibara; Masaya Akashi; Takahide Komori
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2016-09-13

8.  Distal caries of the second molar in the presence of a mandibular third molar - a prevention protocol.

Authors:  V Toedtling; P Coulthard; G Thackray
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2016-09-23       Impact factor: 1.626

9.  Impact of third molar removal on demands for postoperative care and job disruption: does anaesthetic choice make a difference?

Authors:  D J Edwards; J Horton; J P Shepherd; M R Brickley
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 1.891

10.  [Wisdom teeth-complications requiring in-patient treatment. A 1-year prospective study].

Authors:  Martin Kunkel; Thomas Morbach; Wilfried Wagner
Journal:  Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir       Date:  2004-09-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.