AIM: To compare the significance of the two-dimensional and three-dimensional sonography in the diagnosis of meniscal tears under clinical conditions. METHODS: Sixty menisci of knees with clinical symptoms (44 medial and 16 lateral menisci) were examined by an identical transducer in a two- and three-dimensional sonography technique. The findings were compared with the diagnosis made with subsequent arthroscopy. RESULTS: In the diagnosis of meniscal lesions the two- and three-dimensional sonography reached a sensitivity of 92% and 100% and a specificity of 83% and 88%, respectively. The positive predictive value of these methods was 58% and 67%. The negative predictive value was 98% and 100%. Because of the good results with the two-dimensional sonography, there were no statistically significant differences between both methods. The three-dimensional sonography, however, proved to be superior, to the two-dimensional sonography in the analysis of subgroups (medial and lateral menisci, menisci with and without clinical symptoms). The negative predictive value of the three-dimensional sonography was 100% for all of these subgroups. CONCLUSION: Although this study shows no significant difference in the results of two- and three-dimensional sonography, the analysis of subgroups displays a slightly improved significance for diagnosis of meniscal tears by three-dimensional sonography. The high negative predictive value shows that three-dimensional sonography, performed by an experienced examiner, may be useful to exclude meniscal tears. This result may help focus further cost-intensive or invasive examinations.
AIM: To compare the significance of the two-dimensional and three-dimensional sonography in the diagnosis of meniscal tears under clinical conditions. METHODS: Sixty menisci of knees with clinical symptoms (44 medial and 16 lateral menisci) were examined by an identical transducer in a two- and three-dimensional sonography technique. The findings were compared with the diagnosis made with subsequent arthroscopy. RESULTS: In the diagnosis of meniscal lesions the two- and three-dimensional sonography reached a sensitivity of 92% and 100% and a specificity of 83% and 88%, respectively. The positive predictive value of these methods was 58% and 67%. The negative predictive value was 98% and 100%. Because of the good results with the two-dimensional sonography, there were no statistically significant differences between both methods. The three-dimensional sonography, however, proved to be superior, to the two-dimensional sonography in the analysis of subgroups (medial and lateral menisci, menisci with and without clinical symptoms). The negative predictive value of the three-dimensional sonography was 100% for all of these subgroups. CONCLUSION: Although this study shows no significant difference in the results of two- and three-dimensional sonography, the analysis of subgroups displays a slightly improved significance for diagnosis of meniscal tears by three-dimensional sonography. The high negative predictive value shows that three-dimensional sonography, performed by an experienced examiner, may be useful to exclude meniscal tears. This result may help focus further cost-intensive or invasive examinations.