Literature DB >> 9576301

Trends in the survival of American Indian, Hispanic, and Non-Hispanic white cancer patients in New Mexico and Arizona, 1969-1994.

F D Gilliland1, W C Hunt, C R Key.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The burden of cancer mortality falls disproportionately on cancer patients belonging to ethnic minority groups. In the U.S., African American, Hispanic, and American Indian cancer patients are diagnosed at a more advanced stage and receive less appropriate treatment, resulting in poorer outcomes and higher mortality, than white cancer patients. The authors hypothesized that cancer control strategies based on earlier detection and more effective treatment may be most effective in increasing survival in groups with more advanced disease at diagnosis, less appropriate treatment, and lower survival.
METHODS: Data collected by the New Mexico Tumor Registry, a member organization of the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program of the National Cancer Institute, afforded the authors an opportunity to investigate this hypothesis by studying trends in cancer survival for American Indians, Hispanics, and non-Hispanic whites. The authors examined temporal trends and ethnic disparities in survival for in situ and invasive incident cancer cases at 25 sites diagnosed from 1969 through 1994 in New Mexico residents and in American Indians residing in Arizona.
RESULTS: The distribution of stage became more favorable and the percentage of patients receiving appropriate treatment increased for all three ethnic groups during the study period. Survival improved for patients with cancer at most sites in each ethnic group; however, because the increase in survival was greater for non-Hispanic whites than for American Indians or Hispanics, the number of sites associated with disparities in survival among non-Hispanic whites, American Indians, and Hispanics increased. Differences in the distribution of age, gender, stage at diagnosis, histologic grade, and treatment did not completely explain the improved survival or the ethnic disparities regarding survival.
CONCLUSIONS: Increased cancer control efforts were associated with earlier diagnosis, more patients receiving appropriate therapy, and improved survival for non-Hispanic whites, American Indians, and Hispanics. However, the improvement was greatest for non-Hispanic whites, and disparities in survival results for the different ethnic groups widened over the period of study. Cancer control strategies need to address the specific social, cultural, and biologic prognostic factors that affect different ethnic groups if disparities in outcomes are to be reduced.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9576301     DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0142(19980501)82:9<1784::aid-cncr26>3.0.co;2-#

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  10 in total

1.  An innovative path to improving cancer care in Indian country.

Authors:  L Burhansstipanov; A Gilbert; K LaMarca; L U Krebs
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2001 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.792

2.  Examining predictive models of HRQOL in a population-based, multiethnic sample of women with breast carcinoma.

Authors:  Kimlin T Ashing-Giwa; Judith S Tejero; Jinsook Kim; Geraldine V Padilla; Gerhard Hellemann
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2007-02-06       Impact factor: 4.147

3.  Five-Year Cancer Survival Rates in Oklahoma from 1997 to 2008.

Authors:  Janis Campbell; Krupa Gandhi; Anne Pate; Amanda Janitz; Amber Anderson; Robin Kinnard; Kai Ding
Journal:  J Okla State Med Assoc       Date:  2016 Jul-Aug

Review 4.  Testicular cancer: a narrative review of the role of socioeconomic position from risk to survivorship.

Authors:  Lisa C Richardson; Antonio J Neri; Eric Tai; Jeffrey D Glenn
Journal:  Urol Oncol       Date:  2011-11-27       Impact factor: 3.498

5.  Impact of payer status on treatment of cervical cancer at a tertiary referral center.

Authors:  Kimberly L Levinson; Robert E Bristow; Pamela K Donohue; Norma F Kanarek; Cornelia L Trimble
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2011-05-28       Impact factor: 5.482

6.  Adherence to physician recommendation to colorectal cancer screening colonoscopy among Hispanics.

Authors:  Ghalib Jibara; Lina Jandorf; Monica B Fodera; Katherine N DuHamel
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2011-05-04       Impact factor: 5.128

7.  Neighborhood composition and cancer among Hispanics: tumor stage and size at time of diagnosis.

Authors:  Carlos A Reyes-Ortiz; Karl Eschbach; Dong D Zhang; James S Goodwin
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 4.254

8.  Barriers to screening colonoscopy for low-income Latino and white patients in an urban community health center.

Authors:  Alexander R Green; Angelleen Peters-Lewis; Sanja Percac-Lima; Joseph R Betancourt; James M Richter; Maria-Pamela R Janairo; Gloria B Gamba; Steven J Atlas
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2008-03-19       Impact factor: 5.128

9.  Nativity disparities in late-stage diagnosis and cause-specific survival among Hispanic women with invasive cervical cancer: an analysis of Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results data.

Authors:  Jane R Montealegre; Renke Zhou; E Susan Amirian; Michele Follen; Michael E Scheurer
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2013-08-11       Impact factor: 2.506

10.  Longitudinal, population-based study of racial/ethnic differences in colorectal cancer survival: impact of neighborhood socioeconomic status, treatment and comorbidity.

Authors:  Scarlett Lin Gomez; Cynthia D O'Malley; Antoinette Stroup; Sarah J Shema; William A Satariano
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2007-10-16       Impact factor: 4.430

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.