BACKGROUND: Measurements of serum concentrations of des-gamma-carboxy prothrombin (DCP) are widely used for diagnosing hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, the DCP is not always sensitive enough to detect small HCCs. In the current study, the authors investigated the usefulness of DCP in the early diagnosis of HCC, using a more sensitive enzyme immunoassay than is conventionally employed. METHODS: The authors examined 148 serum samples with DCP concentrations from a conventional assay of less than 100 mAU (arbitrary unit)/mL from 91 patients with HCC and 57 with cirrhosis. DCP concentrations were determined by a more sensitive enzyme immunoassay (ED-036 kit, Eisai Laboratory, Tokyo, Japan) with a minimal detection level of 10 mAU/mL. Ninety-one HCC patients had 43 solitary small HCCs (with a greatest dimension of less than 2 cm). Of these 43 HCCs, 12 were well differentiated. RESULTS: The mean serum concentration of DCP in HCC (48.3 +/- 24.3, mean +/- standard deviation [SD]) was higher than in cirrhosis (20.3 +/- 10.3); this difference was statistically significant. When the tentative cutoff level of 40 mAU/mL (almost corresponding to the mean value + 2SD in patients with cirrhosis) was used as the level of discriminating HCC from cirrhosis, 62% of patients (56 of 91) with HCC had DCP values above this level (sensitivity). However, only three patients with cirrhosis had higher DCP levels. Thus, the specificity of this test was 95% (54 of 57 patients). The total accuracy was 74% (56 + 54/91 + 57). Twenty-three of 43 solitary small HCCs (53%) had DCP values above the cutoff level. Furthermore, 7 of 12 (58%) small, well-differentiated HCCs less than 2 cm in greatest dimension had higher DCP values. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study indicate that DCP determination by sensitive enzyme immunoassay is useful in the early diagnosis of HCC because a high specificity is maintained.
BACKGROUND: Measurements of serum concentrations of des-gamma-carboxy prothrombin (DCP) are widely used for diagnosing hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, the DCP is not always sensitive enough to detect small HCCs. In the current study, the authors investigated the usefulness of DCP in the early diagnosis of HCC, using a more sensitive enzyme immunoassay than is conventionally employed. METHODS: The authors examined 148 serum samples with DCP concentrations from a conventional assay of less than 100 mAU (arbitrary unit)/mL from 91 patients with HCC and 57 with cirrhosis. DCP concentrations were determined by a more sensitive enzyme immunoassay (ED-036 kit, Eisai Laboratory, Tokyo, Japan) with a minimal detection level of 10 mAU/mL. Ninety-one HCC patients had 43 solitary small HCCs (with a greatest dimension of less than 2 cm). Of these 43 HCCs, 12 were well differentiated. RESULTS: The mean serum concentration of DCP in HCC (48.3 +/- 24.3, mean +/- standard deviation [SD]) was higher than in cirrhosis (20.3 +/- 10.3); this difference was statistically significant. When the tentative cutoff level of 40 mAU/mL (almost corresponding to the mean value + 2SD in patients with cirrhosis) was used as the level of discriminating HCC from cirrhosis, 62% of patients (56 of 91) with HCC had DCP values above this level (sensitivity). However, only three patients with cirrhosis had higher DCP levels. Thus, the specificity of this test was 95% (54 of 57 patients). The total accuracy was 74% (56 + 54/91 + 57). Twenty-three of 43 solitary small HCCs (53%) had DCP values above the cutoff level. Furthermore, 7 of 12 (58%) small, well-differentiated HCCs less than 2 cm in greatest dimension had higher DCP values. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study indicate that DCP determination by sensitive enzyme immunoassay is useful in the early diagnosis of HCC because a high specificity is maintained.
Authors: Richard K Sterling; Elizabeth C Wright; Timothy R Morgan; Leonard B Seeff; John C Hoefs; Adrian M Di Bisceglie; Jules L Dienstag; Anna S Lok Journal: Am J Gastroenterol Date: 2011-09-20 Impact factor: 10.864
Authors: Seung In Seo; Hyoung Su Kim; Won Jin Kim; Woon Geon Shin; Doo Jin Kim; Kyung Ho Kim; Myoung Kuk Jang; Jin Heon Lee; Joo Seop Kim; Hak Yang Kim; Dong Joon Kim; Myung Seok Lee; Choong Kee Park Journal: World J Gastroenterol Date: 2015-04-07 Impact factor: 5.742