Literature DB >> 9576201

MRC trial of alpha2b-interferon maintenance therapy in first plateau phase of multiple myeloma. MRC Working Party on Leukaemia in Adults.

M T Drayson1, C E Chapman, J A Dunn, A B Olujohungbe, I C Maclennan.   

Abstract

Plateau phase has been achieved in 64% of all newly diagnosed patients with multiple myeloma treated with the ABCM (adriamycin, BiCNU, cyclophosphamide and melphalan) regimen in the Medical Research Council (MRC) trials; this stable clinical stage of the disease is associated with no more than minimal symptoms. Several studies have found that alpha-interferon (alpha-IFN) maintenance therapy increases the duration of plateau phase, but it is less clear if this translates into prolonged survival. We report the effect of alpha-IFN on the duration of plateau phase and overall survival in a trial with 284 patients who were randomized to receive alpha2b-IFN (Intron-A) or no maintenance therapy during first plateau phase. The minimum follow-up after randomization was 21 months. There was no significant difference in the overall survival between the two treatment groups (X2=0.32, P=0.57). There was a trend towards longer relapse-free survival in the patients allocated alpha-IFN, but this trend to longer plateau phase was not statistically significant (X2 = 1.62, P = 0.2). Disease progression at relapse on alpha-IFN appears to be more severe with greater elevations from plateau levels of serum paraprotein (P = 0.06) and beta2-microglobulin (P= 0.03) levels. Physicians tended to start chemotherapy sooner after diagnosis of relapse when patients had received alpha-IFN (P = 0.16). Although, in common with most other studies, there is a trend for patients treated with alpha-IFN to have a longer plateau phase, this is counteracted by morbidity attributable to the treatment and a somewhat shortened survival post relapse. Meta-analysis of interferon trials is required to assess whether the minor trend for longer survival in patients maintained on alpha-IFN found in some studies is significant and, if so, the extent of this advantage.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9576201     DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2141.1998.00648.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Haematol        ISSN: 0007-1048            Impact factor:   6.998


  3 in total

Review 1.  Therapeutic options in the treatment of multiple myeloma: pharmacoeconomic and quality-of-life considerations.

Authors:  F Wisløff; N Gulbrandsen; E Nord
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 2.  Viewpoint on the impact of interferon in the treatment of multiple myeloma: benefit for a small proportion of patients?

Authors:  J Bladé; J Esteve
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 3.064

Review 3.  Consolidation and Maintenance Therapies for Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma in the Era of Novel Agents.

Authors:  Nitya Nathwani; Jeremy T Larsen; Prashant Kapoor
Journal:  Curr Hematol Malig Rep       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 3.952

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.