Literature DB >> 9576154

Correct utilization of exercise electrocardiographic leads in differentiation of men with coronary artery disease from patients with a low likelihood of coronary artery disease using peak exercise ST-segment depression.

J Viik1, R Lehtinen, V Turjanmaa, K Niemelä, J Malmivuo.   

Abstract

In this study we compared the diagnostic characteristics of the individual exercise electrocardiographic leads, 3 different lead sets comprising standard leads and the effect of the partition value in the detection of coronary artery disease (CAD). The diagnostic variable used was ST-segment depression at peak exercise, and the study population consisted of 101 patients with CAD and 100 patients with a low likelihood of the disease. The lead system used was the Mason-Likar modification of the standard 12-lead system and exercise tests were performed on a bicycle ergometer. The comparisons were performed by means of receiver-operating characteristic analysis and by determining sensitivities at a fixed 95% specificity. These properties, defined here as diagnostic capacity, were the most efficacious in leads I, -aVR, V4, V5, and V6. Diagnostic capacities in leads aVL, aVF, III, V1, and V2 were quite poor; statistical comparisons indicated significant differences between these leads and lead V5 (p < or = 0.0001 in each case). Use of the maximum value of ST-segment depression at peak exercise derived from all 12 leads produced a considerable decrease in the diagnostic capacity of the exercise electrocardiogram compared with lead V5. The exclusion of leads aVL, V1, and III improved the diagnostic capacity compared with the 12-lead set, but it was still smaller than that of lead V5. With use of a lead set with the 5 best leads increased the diagnostic capacity over other lead sets and over any individual lead. Further improvement was noted when a 50% smaller partition value was applied to leads I and -aVR than for the other leads (p = 0.041). In conclusion, this study suggests that use of leads I, -aVR, V4, V5, and V6 is the most influential when differentiating between patients with CAD and patients with a low likelihood of disease using peak exercise ST-segment depression. The effective use of leads I and -aVR requires the partition value applied for these leads to be 50% smaller than that used for the lateral precordial leads.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9576154     DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9149(98)00073-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  3 in total

1.  Advanced hybrid stress testing: a potential new paradigm combining exercise and pharmacologic stress.

Authors:  Gregory S Thomas; Harkawal S Hundal; Myrvin H Ellestad
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 5.952

2.  Improving the ECG classification of inferior and lateral myocardial infarction by inversion of lead aVR.

Authors:  I B Menown; A A Adgey
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 5.994

3.  The Finnish Cardiovascular Study (FINCAVAS): characterising patients with high risk of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality.

Authors:  Tuomo Nieminen; Rami Lehtinen; Jari Viik; Terho Lehtimäki; Kari Niemelä; Kjell Nikus; Mari Niemi; Janne Kallio; Tiit Kööbi; Väinö Turjanmaa; Mika Kähönen
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2006-03-03       Impact factor: 2.298

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.