Literature DB >> 9573884

Longitudinal evaluation of growth changes in Class II division 1 subjects.

P W Ngan1, E Byczek, J Scheick.   

Abstract

Longitudinal records from the Ohio State University Growth Study were used to compare the skeletal growth changes between Class II division 1 and Class I female subjects between ages 7 and 14. Tensor analysis was used to determine the yearly growth rate and direction. No significant difference was found in cranial base dimension between the Class I and Class II subjects. In Class II subjects, the maxilla (S-N-A) was found to be normally related to the cranial base. However, mandibular position (S-N-B and S-N-Pog) was found to be significantly more retrusive in Class II when compared with Class I subjects. Mandibular length (Ar-Gn) and corpus length (Go-Gn) were found to be shorter in Class II subjects. The ratio of PFH to AFH was found to be smaller in Class II subjects. This is particularly apparent during the pubertal growth period. The y-axis and mandibular plane angle were more open in Class II subjects which also contributed to the retrusive position of the mandible. Maxillo-mandibular difference (A-N-B) between Class I and II subjects was present at age 7 and persisted through puberty, maintaining a greater angle of convexity (A-N-Pg) in Class II subjects. These results suggest that Class II malocclusion can be detected early. The majority of the Class II cases showed mandibular skeletal retrusion or a combination of horizontal and vertical abnormalities of the mandible rather than maxillary protrusion. These skeletal differences remain through puberty without orthodontic intervention. Individual variations were found within each type of malocclusion.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9573884     DOI: 10.1016/s1073-8746(97)80055-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Semin Orthod        ISSN: 1073-8746            Impact factor:   0.970


  16 in total

1.  Effects of Sabbagh Universal Spring 2 fixed functional appliance on class II/1 patients at their postpubertal-peak growth period compared with the extraction method : A randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Siamak Hemmatpour; Ali Mokhtar; Vahid Rakhshan
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2016-11-17       Impact factor: 1.938

2.  Total maxillary arch distalization by using headgear in an adult patient.

Authors:  Chenshuang Li; Luca Sfogliano; Wenlu Jiang; Haofu Lee; Zhong Zheng; Chun-Hsi Chung; John Jones
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 2.079

3.  Mandibular fossa morphology during therapy with a fixed functional orthodontic appliance : A magnetic resonance imaging study.

Authors:  Gero Stefan Michael Kinzinger; Jan Hourfar; Cornelia Kober; Jörg Alexander Lisson
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2018-02-20       Impact factor: 1.938

4.  Craniofacial growth and morphology among intersecting clinical categories.

Authors:  Ryan P Knigge; Anna M Hardin; Kevin M Middleton; Kieran P McNulty; Hee Soo Oh; Manish Valiathan; Dana L Duren; Richard J Sherwood
Journal:  Anat Rec (Hoboken)       Date:  2022-02-11       Impact factor: 2.227

5.  Phenotypic diversity in white adults with moderate to severe Class II malocclusion.

Authors:  Lina M Moreno Uribe; Sara C Howe; Colleen Kummet; Kaci C Vela; Deborah V Dawson; Thomas E Southard
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 2.650

6.  Class II treatment with fixed functional orthodontic appliances before and after the pubertal growth peak - a cephalometric study to evaluate differential therapeutic effects.

Authors:  Linda Frye; Peter R Diedrich; Gero S M Kinzinger
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2009-12-04       Impact factor: 1.938

7.  Combined fixed-functional treatment of skeletal class II malocclusions with the EVAA appliance: a preliminary study.

Authors:  Deniz Fatma Uzuner; Nilufer Darendeliler; Emel Yucel
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2014-07-06       Impact factor: 1.938

8.  Class II treatment in adults: comparing camouflage orthodontics, dentofacial orthopedics and orthognathic surgery--a cephalometric study to evaluate various therapeutic effects.

Authors:  Gero Kinzinger; Linda Frye; Peter Diedrich
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2009-02-05       Impact factor: 1.938

9.  Comparison of the three-dimensional structures of mandibular condyles between adults with and without facial asymmetry: A retrospective study.

Authors:  Min-Hee Oh; Sung-Ja Kang; Jin-Hyoung Cho
Journal:  Korean J Orthod       Date:  2018-02-06       Impact factor: 1.372

10.  Mandibular growth comparisons of Class I and Class II division 1 skeletofacial patterns.

Authors:  Helder B Jacob; Peter H Buschang
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2014-02-13       Impact factor: 2.079

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.