Literature DB >> 9573874

An evaluation of two-phase treatment with the Herbst appliance and preadjusted edgewise therapy.

M Lai1, J A McNamara.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the skeletal and dentoalveolar changes occurring during two-phase orthodontic treatment. A cephalometric study of Class II correction was carried out in 40 subjects (20 females, 20 males) who had been treated with the acrylic-splint Herbst appliance immediately followed by a second phase of preadjusted edgewise therapy. The average age at the start of Herbst therapy was 12.5 +/- 0.8 years for females and 13.6 +/- 1.2 years for males. Descriptive cephalometric data were compared with the normative values derived from the University of Michigan Elementary and Secondary School Growth Study. Control values were generated for each of the 40 Herbst patients based on gender, initial age, and duration of treatment. The results of this study indicate that the Class II correction achieved during Phase I treatment with Herbst appliance was due mainly to an increase in mandibular length, as well as distal movement of the maxillary molars and mesial movement of the mandibular molars and incisors. The accelerated mandibular growth rate observed during Herbst therapy was followed by a diminished growth rate during the edgewise phase that was less than control values. The overall increase in mandibular length was slight (approximately 1 mm), but significantly greater than control data for the whole group and the male subgroup; however, it was not significantly different between the treatment group and control data in the female subgroup. There were no significant treatment effects on lower anterior facial height and the mandibular plane angle at the end of either phase of treatment. The skeletal changes contributed to 55% of the molar correction during the Herbst therapy, whereas at the end of the second phase of treatment, skeletal change accounted for 80%. Significant anteroposterior dentoalveolar rebound was seen during the edgewise phase.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9573874     DOI: 10.1016/s1073-8746(98)80041-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Semin Orthod        ISSN: 1073-8746            Impact factor:   0.970


  14 in total

Review 1.  Treatment effects of fixed functional appliances in patients with Class II malocclusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Vasileios F Zymperdikas; Vasiliki Koretsi; Spyridon N Papageorgiou; Moschos A Papadopoulos
Journal:  Eur J Orthod       Date:  2015-05-19       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Three-dimensional condylar changes from Herbst appliance and multibracket treatment: A comparison with matched Class II elastics.

Authors:  Robert Y Wei; Arjun Atresh; Antonio Ruellas; Lucia H S Cevidanes; Tung Nguyen; Brent E Larson; Jonathan E Mangum; David J Manton; Paul M Schneider
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2020-08-20       Impact factor: 2.650

3.  Dental and skeletal changes in patients with mandibular retrognathism following treatment with Herbst and pre-adjusted fixed appliance.

Authors:  Fabio de Abreu Vigorito; Gladys Cristina Dominguez; Luís Antônio de Arruda Aidar
Journal:  Dental Press J Orthod       Date:  2014 Jan-Feb

4.  Three-dimensional comparison of the skeletal and dentoalveolar effects of the Herbst and Pendulum appliances followed by fixed appliances: A CBCT study.

Authors:  Kyle L Taylor; Karine Evangelista; Luciana Muniz; Antônio Carlos de Oliveira Ruellas; José Valladares-Neto; James McNamara; Lorenzo Franchi; Hera Kim-Berman; Lucia Helena Soares Cevidanes
Journal:  Orthod Craniofac Res       Date:  2019-10-10       Impact factor: 1.826

5.  Three-dimensional treatment outcomes in Class II patients treated with the Herbst appliance: a pilot study.

Authors:  Megan LeCornu; Lucia H S Cevidanes; Hongtu Zhu; Chih-Da Wu; Brent Larson; Tung Nguyen
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 2.650

6.  Class II treatment with fixed functional orthodontic appliances before and after the pubertal growth peak - a cephalometric study to evaluate differential therapeutic effects.

Authors:  Linda Frye; Peter R Diedrich; Gero S M Kinzinger
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2009-12-04       Impact factor: 1.938

7.  Class II treatment in adults: comparing camouflage orthodontics, dentofacial orthopedics and orthognathic surgery--a cephalometric study to evaluate various therapeutic effects.

Authors:  Gero Kinzinger; Linda Frye; Peter Diedrich
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2009-02-05       Impact factor: 1.938

8.  Treatment effects of the mandibular anterior repositioning appliance in patients with Class II skeletal malocclusions.

Authors:  Marcelo N Kegler Pangrazio; Valmy Pangrazio-Kulbersh; Jeffrey L Berger; Burcu Bayirli; Amin Movahhedian
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2012-03-21       Impact factor: 2.079

9.  A comparison of the MARA and the AdvanSync functional appliances in the treatment of Class II malocclusion.

Authors:  Thikriat S Al-Jewair; Charles B Preston; Eva-Maria Moll; Terry Dischinger
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2012-01-03       Impact factor: 2.079

10.  Mechanisms of Class II correction induced by the crown Herbst appliance as a single-phase Class II therapy: 1 year follow-up.

Authors:  Gundega Jakobsone; Dalia Latkauskiene; James A McNamara
Journal:  Prog Orthod       Date:  2013-09-11       Impact factor: 2.750

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.