Literature DB >> 9573873

Functional appliance therapy with the Bionator.

I Rudzki-Janson1, R Noachtar.   

Abstract

Since the early 20th century, functional appliance therapy has been a significant part of orthodontic treatment, especially in Europe, where functional appliances have been used to treat many malocclusions, including some skeletal discrepancies. Although the success of functional appliance therapy as reported in numerous short-term studies from 1930 to 1975 led to an euphoric acceptance of this method, the few long-term studies, especially those comparing treated with untreated homogeneous control groups, indicated that the specific skeletal and dentoalveolar effects depended on the individual growth period and pattern of the patient. In this article, a specific functional appliance, the Bionator, is presented. Long-term follow-up studies provide indications for its use. At the present time, functional orthopedic appliance therapy has a more limited but well-defined place in our therapeutic approach. The type and character of the malocclusion determines the indications and contraindications of the functional appliance. Scientific and clinical experience has shown the importance of a differential diagnosis for each patient, which integrates etiology and morphogenesis in the individual treatment objectives for special skeletal, dentoalveolar, and functional regions. Individualization in the construction of the appliance, taking the above-mentioned factors into consideration, is essential for optimal clinical results.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9573873     DOI: 10.1016/s1073-8746(98)80040-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Semin Orthod        ISSN: 1073-8746            Impact factor:   0.970


  8 in total

1.  Changes in soft-tissue profiles after treatment of class II/1 patients with bite-jumping appliances.

Authors:  Jörg Alexander Lisson; Kay Mokrys; Gero Stefan Michael Kinzinger; Bettina Glasl; Björn Ludwig
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2013-03-07       Impact factor: 1.938

2.  Effectiveness of bionator therapy for Class II malocclusions: a comparative long-term study.

Authors:  J Kochel; P Meyer-Marcotty; E Witt; A Stellzig-Eisenhauer
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2012-03-07       Impact factor: 1.938

3.  Twenty-year follow-up of functional treatment with a bionator appliance: A retrospective dental cast analysis.

Authors:  Rebecca Jungbauer; Vasiliki Koretsi; Peter Proff; Ingrid Rudzki; Christian Kirschneck
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2019-09-04       Impact factor: 2.079

4.  Therapeutic approach to Class II, Division 1 malocclusion with maxillary functional orthopedics.

Authors:  Aristeu Corrêa de Bittencourt Neto; Armando Yukio Saga; Ariel Adriano Reyes Pacheco; Orlando Tanaka
Journal:  Dental Press J Orthod       Date:  2015 Jul-Aug

5.  Long-term skeletal and dental effects and treatment timing for functional appliances in Class II malocclusion.

Authors:  Lorenzo Franchi; Chiara Pavoni; Kurt Faltin; James A McNamara; Paola Cozza
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2012-08-29       Impact factor: 2.079

6.  Botulinum toxin A injection into the anterior belly of the digastric muscle increased the posterior width of the maxillary arch in developing rats.

Authors:  Janghoon Ahn; Seong-Gon Kim; Min-Keun Kim; Insan Jang; Hyun Seok
Journal:  Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2019-05-06

7.  Long-term dentoskeletal effects and facial profile changes induced by bionator therapy.

Authors:  Luciana Abrao Malta; Tiziano Baccetti; Lorenzo Franchi; Kurt Faltin; James A McNamara
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 2.079

8.  Stability of Class II treatment with the Bionator followed by fixed appliances.

Authors:  Manoela Fávaro Francisconi; José Fernando Castanha Henriques; Guilherme Janson; Karina Maria Salvatore de Freitas; Patrícia Bittencourt Dutra dos Santos
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2013 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.698

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.