Literature DB >> 9573481

Cell cycle checkpoints, chromosome stability and the progression of cancer.

H Nojima1.   

Abstract

During the evolution of normal cells into cancer cells, the occurrence of multiple mutations results in genetic instability. Mutations in DNA repair genes such as those of mismatch and excision repair predispose the carriers of these mutations to cancer by increasing the level of genomic instability. A variety of chromosome aberrations, such as abnormal ploidy, whole chromosome loss or chromosome amplification are commonly observed in cancer cells. From one cell division to the next, mammalian cells pass through an organized series of controlled events referred to as the cell cycle. In order to pursue an ordered series of molecular events, the initiation of an event during cell cycle progression is dependent on the successful completion of an earlier event. The cell cycle is divided into two major phases, namely, M(mitotic) phase and interphase. Interphase can be further divided into three distinct phases termed G1 (gap 1), S(DNA synthesis) and G2(gap2) phases (Fig. 1). Along with the machinery that promotes cell cycle progression, cells are also equipped with cell cycle checkpoints that ensure correct ordering of events in the cell cycle. The idea of "the cell cycle checkpoint" was first introduced by Hartwell and Weinert (1989) as "the arrest of a cell at a particular phase of the cycle due to a lack of appropriate signals for cell cycle progression". Until the checkpoint machinery receives the appropriate signal, the cell will not be allowed to make transition from one phase of the cell cycle to the next. Thus, the major role of checkpoint control is to minimize somatic genetic alterations and/or events affecting cellular survival. When one or more components of a cell cycle checkpoint are mutated, the chances of genetic instability during one round of the cell cycle increase accordingly with consequent acceleration of cellular evolution from the normal to the cancerous state. Therefore, mutations in checkpoint controls may predispose cells to cancer by causing genomic instability. In this review, I will focus on the potential roles of cell cycle checkpoints in the progression of malignancy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9573481

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Cell        ISSN: 0914-7470            Impact factor:   4.174


  7 in total

1.  Structure-function analysis of fission yeast Hus1-Rad1-Rad9 checkpoint complex.

Authors:  R Kaur; C F Kostrub; T Enoch
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 4.138

2.  MIIP haploinsufficiency induces chromosomal instability and promotes tumour progression in colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Yan Sun; Ping Ji; Tao Chen; Xinhui Zhou; Da Yang; Yuhong Guo; Yuexin Liu; Limei Hu; Dianren Xia; Yanxue Liu; Asha S Multani; Ilya Shmulevich; Raju Kucherlapati; Scott Kopetz; Anil K Sood; Stanley R Hamilton; Baocun Sun; Wei Zhang
Journal:  J Pathol       Date:  2016-11-24       Impact factor: 7.996

3.  Mutant alleles of Schizosaccharomyces pombe rad9(+) alter hydroxyurea resistance, radioresistance and checkpoint control.

Authors:  H Hang; S J Rauth; K M Hopkins; H B Lieberman
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2000-11-01       Impact factor: 16.971

4.  Effects of α-mangostin on apoptosis induction of human colon cancer.

Authors:  Ramida Watanapokasin; Faongchat Jarinthanan; Yukio Nakamura; Nitisak Sawasjirakij; Amornmart Jaratrungtawee; Sunit Suksamrarn
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-04-28       Impact factor: 5.742

5.  Oleanolic acid and ursolic acid inhibit proliferation in transformed rat hepatic oval cells.

Authors:  Yu-Ying Han; Xiao-Wei Xue; Zheng-Ming Shi; Peng-Yan Wang; Xin-Rui Wu; Xue-Jiang Wang
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-02-07       Impact factor: 5.742

6.  Tank Binding Kinase 1 modulates spindle assembly checkpoint components to regulate mitosis in breast and lung cancer cells.

Authors:  Meenu Maan; Neha Jaiswal Agrawal; Jaya Padmanabhan; Christelle Colin Leitzinger; Yainyrette Rivera-Rivera; Harold I Saavedra; Srikumar P Chellappan
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta Mol Cell Res       Date:  2020-12-11       Impact factor: 4.739

7.  Cell kinetic markers in cutaneous squamous and basal cell carcinoma of the head and neck.

Authors:  Mojgan Alaeddini; Shahroo Etemad-Moghadam
Journal:  Braz J Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2020-09-12
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.