Literature DB >> 9572605

Cancer disclosure in Japan: historical comparisons, current practices.

T S Elwyn1, M D Fetters, W Gorenflo, T Tsuda.   

Abstract

Although Japanese physicians historically have not disclosed cancer diagnoses to patients, pressures upon physicians to disclose have increased in recent years. We questioned physicians practicing at a private medical hospital in rural Japan about their current approach to cancer disclosure. We compared their responses with responses of physicians in a 1991 study conducted in Japan, and two studies conducted in the United States, in 1961 and in 1977. Seventy-seven clinically active physicians with experience treating cancer patients responded (73% response rate). Forty percent of respondents reported usually telling patients of a cancer diagnosis, over three times more than the 13% who reported such a policy in Japan in 1991. Physicians were significantly more likely (P < 0.001) to make exceptions than physicians in the previous Japanese study, and physicians in the previous U.S. studies. Respondents reported considering more factors in deciding whether to tell than participants in the 1977 U.S. study. Factors predicting an increased probability of disclosure included age (in a hyperbolic relationship), improved prognosis, breast or cervical cancer, and social status and religion (by a minority of respondents). Increase in a substitute decision maker's age was predictive for physicians not to involve the person in decision-making. Most respondents reported their disclosure policy is based on clinical experience. More respondents indicated a likelihood of changing in the future than respondents in the previous U.S. studies. These data suggest Japanese physicians are moving away from a rigid policy of nondisclosure to a policy of selective disclosure, but they have not adopted universal cancer disclosure as practiced in many Western countries. Since young age and advanced age predicted self-reports of not disclosing cancer diagnoses, these data raise the question of whether nondisclosure by age groups represents age discrimination or compassionate medical care tailored to individual patient needs.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Empirical Approach; Professional Patient Relationship

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9572605     DOI: 10.1016/s0277-9536(97)10042-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Sci Med        ISSN: 0277-9536            Impact factor:   4.634


  21 in total

1.  Public passages, personal passages, and reluctant passages: notes on investigating cancer disclosure practices in Japan.

Authors:  Susan Orpett Long
Journal:  J Med Humanit       Date:  2000

Review 2.  Reluctance to disclose difficult diagnoses: a narrative review comparing communication by psychiatrists and oncologists.

Authors:  Alex J Mitchell
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 3.  Cultural and religious considerations in pediatric palliative care.

Authors:  Lori Wiener; Denice Grady McConnell; Lauren Latella; Erica Ludi
Journal:  Palliat Support Care       Date:  2012-05-22

4.  A survey of disclosure of diagnosis to patients with glioma in Japan.

Authors:  Fukuko Yamamoto; Naoya Hashimoto; Naoki Kagawa; Yoshiko Okita; Yasuyoshi Chiba; Noriyuki Kijima; Manabu Kinoshita; Kikuko Yoshizu; Yasunori Fujimoto; Kei Hirai; Toshiki Yoshimine
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-12-08       Impact factor: 3.402

5.  Transitions in Prognostic Awareness Among Terminally Ill Cancer Patients in Their Last 6 Months of Life Examined by Multi-State Markov Modeling.

Authors:  Chen Hsiu Chen; Fur-Hsing Wen; Ming-Mo Hou; Chia-Hsun Hsieh; Wen-Chi Chou; Jen-Shi Chen; Wen-Cheng Chang; Siew Tzuh Tang
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2017-07-06

6.  Family consent, communication, and advance directives for cancer disclosure: a Japanese case and discussion.

Authors:  A Akabayashi; M D Fetters; T S Elwyn
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 2.903

Review 7.  Prognostic Disclosures to Children: A Historical Perspective.

Authors:  Bryan A Sisk; Myra Bluebond-Langner; Lori Wiener; Jennifer Mack; Joanne Wolfe
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2016-08-25       Impact factor: 7.124

8.  Validity of self-reported information on cancer: determinants of under- and over-reporting.

Authors:  Jonas Manjer; Juan Merlo; Göran Berglund
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 8.082

9.  Acculturation of attitudes toward end-of-life care: a cross-cultural survey of Japanese Americans and Japanese.

Authors:  Shinji Matsumura; Seiji Bito; Honghu Liu; Katharine Kahn; Shunichi Fukuhara; Marjorie Kagawa-Singer; Neil Wenger
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 5.128

10.  Psychiatric morbidity among cancer patients and awareness of illness.

Authors:  Figen Culha Atesci; Bahar Baltalarli; Nalan Kalkan Oguzhanoglu; Filiz Karadag; Osman Ozdel; Nursel Karagoz
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2004-01-28       Impact factor: 3.603

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.