Literature DB >> 9572437

Nurses performing embryo transfer: the development and results of the Birmingham experience.

L Sinclair1, C Morgan, H Lashen, M Afnan, K Sharif.   

Abstract

Although in-vitro fertilization treatment is doctor-led, many of its steps are performed by nurses. The embryo transfer step, however, is performed exclusively by doctors in the majority of units. In our unit, doctors performed embryo transfers from June 1994 until December 1995 (period I). From January 1996 until May 1997 (period II) the nurses, after appropriate training, performed the procedure. When they experienced difficulties during the mock transfer performed immediately before the real transfer, or if they were not available to do the procedure, a doctor performed it. In period I, 488 embryo transfers were performed (all by doctors), with a pregnancy rate per transfer of 35% and an implantation rate of 16%. In period II, 522 embryo transfers were performed. Nurses performed 371 (71%) and doctors 151 (29%) of the procedures. The pregnancy rate per nurse-transfer was 40.2% and per doctor-transfer 41%. The corresponding implantation rates were 16.9% and 17%. None of these differences were statistically significant (P > 0.05). These data indicate that, with appropriate training and medical back-up, nurses can perform the majority of embryo transfers with ease and outcome comparable to that of doctor embryo transfer.

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9572437     DOI: 10.1093/humrep/13.3.699

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod        ISSN: 0268-1161            Impact factor:   6.918


  3 in total

1.  Role of embryo transfer in fellowship training.

Authors:  Michael D Wittenberger; William H Catherino; Alicia Y Armstrong
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2007-04-06       Impact factor: 7.329

2.  Do trained reproductive endocrinologists perform better than their trainees? Comparing clinical pregnancy rates and live birth rates after transfer of single fresh blastocysts.

Authors:  Sadikah Behbehani; Joseph Hasson; Stefano Polesello; W Y Son; Togas Tulandi; William Buckett
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2018-02-09       Impact factor: 3.412

3.  Factors affecting assisted reproductive technology (ART) pregnancy rates: a multivariate analysis.

Authors:  Tiffany L Rhodes; Thomas P McCoy; H Lee Higdon; William R Boone
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 3.412

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.