Literature DB >> 9572426

Isolation, purification and assessment of viability of spermatogenic cells from testicular biopsies of azoospermic men.

I Aslam1, A Robins, K Dowell, S Fishel.   

Abstract

The success of spermatid microinjection has generated many concerns. In particular, there is a lack of appropriate methodology for the isolation of large homogeneous populations of spermatids, with minimum loss of viability, from the testicular tissue of azoospermic men. Here we have compared two different isolation methods -- velocity sedimentation under unit gravity (VSUG) combined with discontinuous Percoll centrifugation (DPC), and separation with fluorescent-activated cell sorter (FACS) using light in the visible range -- to determine the most suitable method for the isolation of spermatids. Total mixed cell count/gram of testicular parenchyma was significantly higher in obstructive azoospermic men compared with non-obstructive azoospermic men (P < 0.001). The results of the comparison showed that in obstructive azoospermic patients the difference in the yields of primary spermatocytes produced by the two techniques was not significant, but for round and elongating spermatids the FACS separation proved to be the better method (P < 0.001). Similarly, in non-obstructive azoospermic patients, FACS separation proved to be superior, giving increased yields of primary spermatocytes and round and elongating spermatids compared with VSUG combined with DPC method (P < 0.001). More than 99 % of the separated cells retained their viability after FACS separation. As large homogeneous populations of viable spermatids can be separated with FACS in a relatively short period of time, FACS separation is the most suitable method for the isolation of spermatids from testicular biopsy tissue.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9572426     DOI: 10.1093/humrep/13.3.639

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod        ISSN: 0268-1161            Impact factor:   6.918


  6 in total

1.  Evaluation of the expression of sperm proteins in normozoospermic and asthenozoospermic men using monoclonal antibodies.

Authors:  Jana Capkova; Alena Kubatova; Lukas Ded; Olina Tepla; Jana Peknicova
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2016 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.285

2.  Generation of viable progeny from dead brooders of endangered catfish Clarias magur (Hamilton, 1822).

Authors:  Sullip Kumar Majhi; Santosh Kumar
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2017-10-31

3.  Bovid microRNAs involved in the process of spermatogonia differentiation into spermatocytes.

Authors:  Chuanfei Xu; Mujahid Ali Shah; TserangDonko Mipam; Shixin Wu; Chuanping Yi; Hui Luo; Meng Yuan; Zhixin Chai; Wangsheng Zhao; Xin Cai
Journal:  Int J Biol Sci       Date:  2020-01-01       Impact factor: 6.580

4.  Genetic and Epigenetic Evaluation of Human Spermatogonial Stem Cells Isolated by MACS in Different Two and Three-Dimensional Culture Systems.

Authors:  Maria Zahiri; Mansoureh Movahedin; Seyed Javad Mowla; Mehrdad Noruzinia; Morteza Koruji; Mohammad Reza Nowroozi; Fatemeh Asgari
Journal:  Cell J       Date:  2022-08-28       Impact factor: 3.128

5.  Improvement of Expression of α6 and β1 Integrins by the Co-culture of Adult Mouse Spermatogonial Stem Cells with SIM Mouse Embryonic Fibroblast Cells (STO) and Growth Factors.

Authors:  Tayebeh Rastegar; Mohammad Bagher Minaee; Mehryar Habibi Roudkenar; Iraj Raghardi Kashani; Fardin Amidi; Farid Abolhasani; Mohammad Barbarestani
Journal:  Iran J Basic Med Sci       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 2.699

6.  The interaction between Sertoli cells and luekemia inhibitory factor on the propagation and differentiation of spermatogonial stem cells in vitro.

Authors:  Tayebeh Rastegar; Mehryar Habibi Roudkenar; Soraya Parvari; Maryam Baazm
Journal:  Iran J Reprod Med       Date:  2015-11
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.