A J Spillane1, P J Crowe. 1. Department of General Surgery, Prince of Wales Hospital, Randwick, New South Wales, Australia.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The development of skills in critical appraisal of the medical literature is an important aspect of surgical training. METHODS: At the Prince of Wales Hospital a journal club has been conducted for more than 5 years to improve the registrars' training in this area. A questionnaire was circulated regarding the success of the journal club at achieving adequate review of the important current literature, development of critical appraisal skills by registrars and providing a convivial social gathering. RESULTS: A total of 28 out of 39 current or previous journal club members responded to the questionnaire. Twenty-three of the respondents felt that the journal club provided a good to excellent review of current literature, 26 felt that the journal club facilitated development of critical appraisal skills and all 28 said that the journal club was a convivial social forum. Eight research projects developed from journal club reviews, 19 of the respondents reported that their clinical practice had changed, and 19 had been stimulated to further review a topic as a result of the journal club. Many of the respondents had specific criticisms of the journal club, and these have been used to improve the journal club format. CONCLUSIONS: The present study has highlighted the strengths and weaknesses of our journal club. The journal club is a valuable component of surgical education.
BACKGROUND: The development of skills in critical appraisal of the medical literature is an important aspect of surgical training. METHODS: At the Prince of Wales Hospital a journal club has been conducted for more than 5 years to improve the registrars' training in this area. A questionnaire was circulated regarding the success of the journal club at achieving adequate review of the important current literature, development of critical appraisal skills by registrars and providing a convivial social gathering. RESULTS: A total of 28 out of 39 current or previous journal club members responded to the questionnaire. Twenty-three of the respondents felt that the journal club provided a good to excellent review of current literature, 26 felt that the journal club facilitated development of critical appraisal skills and all 28 said that the journal club was a convivial social forum. Eight research projects developed from journal club reviews, 19 of the respondents reported that their clinical practice had changed, and 19 had been stimulated to further review a topic as a result of the journal club. Many of the respondents had specific criticisms of the journal club, and these have been used to improve the journal club format. CONCLUSIONS: The present study has highlighted the strengths and weaknesses of our journal club. The journal club is a valuable component of surgical education.