J Rydberg1, J Charles, P Aspelin. 1. Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Karolinska Institute, Huddinge University Hospital, Sweden.
Abstract
PURPOSE: A retrospective study was undertaken of the late adverse reactions following the injection of contrast media. The purpose was to determine whether there was a difference between non-ionic monomeric (iohexol) and non-ionic dimeric (iodixanol) contrast media in the reactions produced. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 3,408 patients were sent a written questionnaire in which they were asked to confirm or deny any subjective discomfort or adverse event during a period of one hour to one week after a previous radiological examination with contrast medium. Patients who had undergone angiography (i.v. or i.a. injection) and CT (i.v. injection) were included. Objective signs of an allergy-like reaction were listed and the patients were asked to subjectively quantify any consequent discomfort. RESULTS: The compliance rate was 84%. Of the 3075 injections finally included in the study, 133 (4.3%) had resulted in contrast-medium-related adverse reactions of which 72 (2.3%) were immediate and 61 (2%) were late. Iohexol induced late reactions in 14/851 (1.7%) cases, and iodixanol in 24/1218 (2.0%) cases following i.v. injection and in 23/1006 (2.3%) cases following i.a. injection. The differences were not significant. There were no differences between the two contrast media in the subjective rating of discomfort except that the patients who had received iodixanol also had the highest individual-intensity score. No patient had been hospitalized owing to an adverse reaction and all reactions had been regarded as mild or moderate. CONCLUSION: The number of late adverse reactions was low. There was no difference in the frequency of the late adverse reactions following i.v. injection between iodixanol and iohexol. There was also no difference in the reactions between the i.a. and i.v. injections of iodixanol.
PURPOSE: A retrospective study was undertaken of the late adverse reactions following the injection of contrast media. The purpose was to determine whether there was a difference between non-ionic monomeric (iohexol) and non-ionic dimeric (iodixanol) contrast media in the reactions produced. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 3,408 patients were sent a written questionnaire in which they were asked to confirm or deny any subjective discomfort or adverse event during a period of one hour to one week after a previous radiological examination with contrast medium. Patients who had undergone angiography (i.v. or i.a. injection) and CT (i.v. injection) were included. Objective signs of an allergy-like reaction were listed and the patients were asked to subjectively quantify any consequent discomfort. RESULTS: The compliance rate was 84%. Of the 3075 injections finally included in the study, 133 (4.3%) had resulted in contrast-medium-related adverse reactions of which 72 (2.3%) were immediate and 61 (2%) were late. Iohexol induced late reactions in 14/851 (1.7%) cases, and iodixanol in 24/1218 (2.0%) cases following i.v. injection and in 23/1006 (2.3%) cases following i.a. injection. The differences were not significant. There were no differences between the two contrast media in the subjective rating of discomfort except that the patients who had received iodixanol also had the highest individual-intensity score. No patient had been hospitalized owing to an adverse reaction and all reactions had been regarded as mild or moderate. CONCLUSION: The number of late adverse reactions was low. There was no difference in the frequency of the late adverse reactions following i.v. injection between iodixanol and iohexol. There was also no difference in the reactions between the i.a. and i.v. injections of iodixanol.
Authors: Marie-France Bellin; Fulvio Stacul; Judith A W Webb; Henrik S Thomsen; Sameh K Morcos; Torsten Almén; Peter Aspelin; Olivier Clement; Gertraud Heinz-Peer; Peter Reimer; Aart van der Molen Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2011-07-16 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: M J Torres; C Mayorga; J A Cornejo-Garcia; S Lopez; P Chaves; C Rondon; T Fernandez; M Blanca Journal: Clin Exp Immunol Date: 2008-03-12 Impact factor: 4.330