Literature DB >> 9571478

A comparative study of two methods of controlled mobilization of flexor tendon repairs in zone 2.

F H Peck1, C A Bücher, J S Watson, A Roe.   

Abstract

This prospective study compares subjects following primary repair of flexor tendons in zone 2 using either controlled active motion or a modified Kleinert regime. A matched pairs design was employed, subjects being matched for gender, age and injury characteristics. Twenty-six pairs of subjects with 92 tendon injuries in 52 digits were assessed 12 weeks postoperatively in respect of range of motion and dehiscence. Outcomes were defined using the Strickland criteria. No statistically significant differences in respect of range of motion were demonstrated between the groups. Incidence of rupture, however, was significantly less in the modified Kleinert group (7.7%) than in the controlled active motion group (46%).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9571478     DOI: 10.1016/s0266-7681(98)80216-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hand Surg Br        ISSN: 0266-7681


  9 in total

1.  Flexor digitorum profundus tendon tension during finger manipulation.

Authors:  Tatsuro Tanaka; Peter C Amadio; Chunfeng Zhao; Mark E Zobitz; Kai-Nan An
Journal:  J Hand Ther       Date:  2005 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 1.950

2.  Does strand configuration and number of purchase points affect the biomechanical behavior of a tendon repair? A biomechanical evaluation using different kessler methods of flexor tendon repair.

Authors:  Yunus Dogramaci; Aydiner Kalaci; Teoman Toni Sevinç; Erdinc Esen; Mahmut Komurcu; Ahmet Nedim Yanat
Journal:  Hand (N Y)       Date:  2008-05-28

3.  Autonomous Patient-Controlled Mobilization Protocol After Flexor Tendon Repair: A Case Series.

Authors:  Bárbara Gómez; María Rodríguez; Luis García
Journal:  Hand (N Y)       Date:  2020-10-20

4.  Lubricin surface modification improves tendon gliding after tendon repair in a canine model in vitro.

Authors:  Manabu Taguchi; Yu-Long Sun; Chunfeng Zhao; Mark E Zobitz; Chung-Ja Cha; Gregory D Jay; Kai-Nan An; Peter C Amadio
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 3.494

5.  Rehabilitation following surgery for flexor tendon injuries of the hand.

Authors:  Susan E Peters; Bhavana Jha; Mark Ross
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-01-13

Review 6.  The role of animal models in tendon research.

Authors:  M W Hast; A Zuskov; L J Soslowsky
Journal:  Bone Joint Res       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 5.853

7.  Flexor tendon injuries of the hand treated with TenoFix: mid-term results.

Authors:  Lorenzo Rocchi; Antonio Merolli; Andrea Genzini; Gianfranco Merendi; Francesco Catalano
Journal:  J Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2008-07-17

Review 8.  ICF components of corresponding outcome measures in flexor tendon rehabilitation - a systematic review.

Authors:  Renée Oltman; Gudrun Neises; Daniel Scheible; Gerhard Mehrtens; Christian Grüneberg
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2008-10-15       Impact factor: 2.362

9.  Assessing Finger Joint Biomechanics by Applying Equal Force to Flexor Tendons In Vitro Using a Novel Simultaneous Approach.

Authors:  Tai-Hua Yang; Szu-Ching Lu; Wei-Jr Lin; Kristin Zhao; Chunfeng Zhao; Kai-Nan An; I-Ming Jou; Pei-Yuan Lee; Li-Chieh Kuo; Fong-Chin Su
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-08-11       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.