Literature DB >> 9571338

The effect of glycemic control in the pre-conception period and early pregnancy on birth weight in women with IDDM.

A E Gold1, R Reilly, J Little, J D Walker.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine data from pregnancies in women with IDDM to assess the relative effects of mean glycosylated hemoglobin levels before conception, at booking, and during the 3 trimesters of pregnancy on birth weight. Good glycemic control during pregnancy in women with IDDM is important to minimize the risk of fetal malformation and macrosomia. Recent studies have suggested that glycemic control in the 1st trimester is more important than glycemic control during the 2nd or 3rd trimesters. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: The case records of 65 deliveries to women with IDDM were reviewed. Fifty-seven deliveries were included in the present study. Of the deliveries reviewed, 32 women were in their first pregnancy and 25 women were multiparous. Only viable pregnancies were included because the major outcome variable of interest was birth weight. Glycosylated hemoglobin was recorded for each time period.
RESULTS: The median standardized birth weight was 1.1 SD higher than the nondiabetic mean. When pregnancies, in which the birth weight was greater than 1 SD above the nondiabetic mean, were compared with pregnancies, in which birth weight was less than 1 SD above the mean, significant differences were observed between the groups in HbA1 at 6-12 months pre-conception (10.0 +/- 2.3 vs. 8.6 +/- 1.4%, P = 0.02), at 0-6 months pre-conception (10.2 +/- 2.4 vs. 8.7 +/- 2.0%, P = 0.03), at booking (9.5 +/- 2.2 vs. 8.4 +/- 1.6%, P = 0.04), and at 0-12 weeks' gestation (9.5 +/- 2.2 vs. 8.0 +/- 1.3%, P = 0.04), but HbA1 later in pregnancy did not differ significantly between the groups. Correlational analysis of all 57 pregnancies revealed significant correlations between birth weight and HbA1 at 0-6 months pre-conception (r = 0.44, P = 0.002), at booking (r = 0.43, P = 0.001), at 0-12 weeks' gestation (r = 0.48, P = 0.001), at 12-24 weeks' gestation (r = 0.45, P = 0.001), and at 24 weeks to term (r = 0.34, P = 0.009). However, with stepwise regression analysis, only HbA1 at 0-12 weeks' gestation entered into the equation with a multiple r value of 0.48.
CONCLUSIONS: Glycemic control in the immediate pre-conception period and early 1st trimester appears to have a greater influence on birth weight than does glycemic control during the later weeks of pregnancy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9571338     DOI: 10.2337/diacare.21.4.535

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diabetes Care        ISSN: 0149-5992            Impact factor:   19.112


  11 in total

1.  HbA(1c) and birthweight in women with pre-conception type 1 and type 2 diabetes: a population-based cohort study.

Authors:  S V Glinianaia; P W G Tennant; R W Bilous; J Rankin; R Bell
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2012-09-27       Impact factor: 10.122

2.  Sibling birthweight as a predictor of macrosomia in women with type 1 diabetes.

Authors:  A Kerssen; H W de Valk; G H A Visser
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2005-07-14       Impact factor: 10.122

3.  Perinatal factors, female breast cancer, and associated risk factors in Puerto Rico: evidence from the Atabey epidemiology of breast cancer study.

Authors:  Lindsey J Mattick; Cruz M Nazario; Rosa V Rosario-Rosado; Michelle Schelske-Santos; Imar Mansilla-Rivera; Farah A Ramírez-Marrero; Jing Nie; Jo L Freudenheim
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2022-01-09       Impact factor: 2.506

4.  Cost effectiveness of ACE inhibitor treatment for patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Frederick B Dong; Stephen W Sorensen; Diane L Manninen; Theodore J Thompson; Venkat Narayan; Carlyn E Orians; Edward W Gregg; Richard C Eastman; Erik J Dasbach; William H Herman; Jeffrey M Newman; Andrew S Narva; David J Ballard; Michael M Engelgau
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 4.981

5.  Risk factors and outcomes of fetal macrosomia in a tertiary centre in Tanzania: a case-control study.

Authors:  Aisha Salim Said; Karim Premji Manji
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2016-08-24       Impact factor: 3.007

6.  Fetal overgrowth in women with type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Linnea Ladfors; Nael Shaat; Nana Wiberg; Anastasia Katasarou; Kerstin Berntorp; Karl Kristensen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-11-09       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Reliability of glycosylated hemoglobin in the diagnosis of gestational diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Duria A Rayis; Abdel B A Ahmed; Manal E Sharif; Amir ElSouli; Ishag Adam
Journal:  J Clin Lab Anal       Date:  2020-07-02       Impact factor: 2.352

8.  Awareness of Preconception Care and Its Related Factors Among Women of Childbearing Age with Type 1 Diabetes in the South of Saudi Arabia: A Cross-Sectional Survey Study.

Authors:  Mohammed Jeraiby
Journal:  Int J Gen Med       Date:  2021-11-23

Review 9.  The fetal glucose steal: an underappreciated phenomenon in diabetic pregnancy.

Authors:  Gernot Desoye; Christopher J Nolan
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2016-03-19       Impact factor: 10.122

Review 10.  Biomarkers for Macrosomia Prediction in Pregnancies Affected by Diabetes.

Authors:  Sofia Nahavandi; Jas-Mine Seah; Alexis Shub; Christine Houlihan; Elif I Ekinci
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2018-07-31       Impact factor: 5.555

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.