Literature DB >> 9570201

A call for provisional stenting: the balloon is back!

C R Narins1, D R Holmes, E J Topol.   

Abstract

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9570201     DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.97.13.1298

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


× No keyword cloud information.
  6 in total

Review 1.  Intervention in coronary artery disease.

Authors:  S Windecker; B Meier
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 5.994

2.  Is provisional stenting the effective option? The WIDEST study (Wiktor stent in de novo stenosis). Widest Trial Investigators' Group.

Authors:  D S Fluck; P Chenu; P Mills; A Davies; J Street; E Paul; R Balcon; C A Layton
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 5.994

3.  Function and structure of pressurized and perfused porcine carotid arteries: effects of in vitro balloon angioplasty.

Authors:  Jop Perrée; Ton G van Leeuwen; Raphaella Kerindongo; Jos A E Spaan; Ed VanBavel
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 4.307

4.  Coronary stent symmetry and vascular injury determine experimental restenosis.

Authors:  C Schulz; R A Herrmann; C Beilharz; J Pasquantonio; E Alt
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 5.  Gene therapy for restenosis: current status.

Authors:  Juha Rutanen; Johanna Markkanen; Seppo Ylä-Herttuala
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 9.546

6.  A new approach to the assessment of lumen visibility of coronary artery stent at various heart rates using 64-slice MDCT.

Authors:  J M Groen; M J W Greuter; P M A van Ooijen; M Oudkerk
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2007-02-16       Impact factor: 5.315

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.