Literature DB >> 9569402

Future of preschool vision screening. Conclusions for or against services are invalid without appropriate research evidence.

C Williams, R A Harrad, J M Sparrow, I Harvey, J Golding.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  1998        PMID： 9569402      PMCID： PMC1112827          DOI： 10.1136/bmj.316.7135.937a

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ        ISSN： 0959-8138


× No keyword cloud information.
  7 in total

1.  Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.

Authors:  D G Altman; J M Bland
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1995-08-19

2.  Methodology for a randomised controlled trial of preschool vision screening. A new approach with the 'ALSPAC' project.

Authors:  C Williams; R A Harrad; I Harvey; S Frankel; J Golding
Journal:  Ophthalmic Epidemiol       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 1.648

3.  Effective screening in child health.

Authors:  R Robinson
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-01-03

4.  The future of preschool vision screening services in Britain.

Authors:  J S Rahi; C Dezateux
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1997-11-15

5.  More widespread public debate on rationing is essential.

Authors:  I Heath; S Amiel
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1997-11-15

6.  Visual acuity testing in schools: what needs to be done.

Authors:  Y F Yang; M D Cole
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1996-10-26

7.  Review of children referred from the school vision screening programme in Kettering during 1976-8.

Authors:  R M Ingram
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1989-04-08
  7 in total
  2 in total

1.  Natural history of amblyopia untreated owing to lack of compliance.

Authors:  K Simons; M Preslan
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 4.638

Review 2.  The relationship between anisometropia and amblyopia.

Authors:  Brendan T Barrett; Arthur Bradley; T Rowan Candy
Journal:  Prog Retin Eye Res       Date:  2013-06-15       Impact factor: 21.198
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.